Talk:Fellowship of the Rosy Cross

No link to Rosicrucians? Wetman 23:08, 23 Dec 2003 (UTC)

Fellowship of the Rosy Cross

Dear user Goblin, the article Fellowship of the Rosy Cross you purpose to be merged is POV about a modern group which is stated, and linked, already at the related Modern groups section: AMORC (which entitles themselves as the real Order; which is their own POV). If you'd like to merge it, you should do it into the article about this refered modern organization and not in the article about the Rosicrucian Order ("Rosicrucian") - legend, history, movement, 19th/20th century modern groups, etc. - presented in a NPOV way. Following this explanation I'm reverting the merge tag. Regards, --212.113.164.104 16:07, 4 December 2005 (UTC) GalaazV P.S.: On the other hand, the Fellowship of the Rosy Cross was a Christian-Kabbalastic organization founded by Arthur Edward Waite [1] in England (as it was written in the first edition of the article) and not by AMORC. This means that even the words presented at the article your purpose to merge are not true (according to history events); My point of view is the all article Fellowship of the Rosy Cross seems innacurate, misguiding, publicity and POV and, as such, it should be erased (or reverted to its first edition) and not merged with any other article.

I don't understand how this article managed to remain the way it was for so long! The Fellowship of the Rosy Cross has nothing to do with AMORC, as the above comment explains. As such I've reverted the article to a version that's two years old. Someone please take the recent incorrect text and move it to a new article with the appropriate name. Not Fellowship of the Rosy Cross. I don't know what the appropriate name is if it's not Ancient Mystical Order Rosae Crucis; I'll leave someone else to figure that out. Fuzzypeg☻ 01:35, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Re-directing stub-article into Rosy Cross article which already has reference to Arthur Edward Waite. --Lusitanian 00:13, 21 May 2007 (UTC)