Jump to content

Talk:Abhorsen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested Move

[edit]
Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~

You spelled Abhorsen wrong Nihiltres 16:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC) *Alternative - While I support your idea, I do not support it as it is currently proposed. It would be a good thing to have an article on the bloodlines within the series, but not a good thing to have seperate articles on each of the bloodlines, since there is not enough information contained within the books to create full distinct articles. A "bloodlines" article is one I support, but not individual ones! Individual ones can be used as redirects - we can put a link "This article is about the book. For the bloodline..." Thanks. Nihiltres 16:05, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, after a further comment from Nihiltres (see his talk page), I guess that his idea sounds reasonable: to expand on and maybe reconstruct the Five Great Charters article to accommodate new information. I'll wait for a while and see if this option gets agreement from a few more people. Thanks again, Nihiltres, for the suggestion.
The coolest guy you know - The Ninth Bright Shiner 19:43, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'll remove this from WP:RM now, then. —Nightstallion (?) Seen this already? 07:23, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

[edit]
Add any additional comments

Pronunciation

[edit]

how do you pronuce this title. A-B-H-O-R-S-E-N

its "abb-horse-in" - Abhorsen123

I say it Abb- horse - unn, otherwise its difficult to say Abhorsen-in-waiting. racooon

I say it "a-bor-sen" Orannis the Ninth Bright Shiner (talk) 04:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know its wrong but i say os-bor-horn. lol i missread when i first read it Luke12345abcd (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article intro

[edit]

This article needs some restructuring at the top - I'm not sure exactly how to go about it, and am busy (when I finish extrawiki activities, I'm busy polishing off Shade's Children). My main issue is with spoilers - there are some prominent spoilers that are above the spoiler line: that Lirael is the Abhorsen-in-Waiting, and that she is also Sam's aunt are key spoilers that need to be addressed by restructuring the article. This article also needs a proper introduction - introducing the book as per Novels WikiProject standard. Sorry that I'm just leaving a complaint and not going to fix it myself - If I find time and it's not done, I'll do what I can. Nihiltres 15:21, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It ruined parts of the book for me. I can't edit it either, as I'm a novice and I haven't finished the book yet. Life is great...if you support Manchester United 16:33, 28 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot summary

[edit]

The plot summary could use a bit of a trimming for detail, but it isn't grossly overlong, so I've removed the {{plot}} tag. --TS 23:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Intro

[edit]

What happened ot the plot introduction, Lirael and Sabriel have it, why not abhorsen? --Orannis the Destroyer 22:37, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Proposed Merge

[edit]

Please see this discussion, where there is a proposal to merge several Abhorsen-related articles. Comments are welcome. sbfw | talk 00:32, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Abhorsen. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]