User talk:Seano1

Welcome!

Hello, Seano1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 00:26, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)

Image:GT40.jpg

Hello. Thanks for uploading image:GT40.jpg and for giving it a copyright tag. However, you also need to add source info to the image description page, most importantly who took the photograph (and therefore who owns the copyright), and maybe where and when it was taken. This is so we can be sure that the image is usable under the specified license, in this case the GFDL. Thanks, SamH 12:12, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC).

Thanks for adding that info, but can I just confirm that you are Sean O'Flaherty? Thanks again, SamH|Talk 11:02, 14 Jan 2005 (UTC).

Image:2004-Bremerhaven U-Boot-Museum-Sicherlich.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:2004-Bremerhaven U-Boot-Museum-Sicherlich.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 09:23, May 21, 2005 (UTC)

Special thanks

For Wikifying the Charles Taze Russell article that was completely void of links, you have been awarded the Workingman's Barnstar. Robert McClenon 00:19, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Michael J. Bernard

Thanks for your contribution to the Michael J. Bernard article. If you have any references, you should cite them at the bottom of the article as soon as possible; otherwise the article might be nominated for deletion in accordance with the guidelines at Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thanks. --TantalumTelluride 03:47, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks, mate, for wikifying my recent catastrophical double-article... I swear I searched for it, but I guess I didn't look hard enough... all fixed up now, I think. Cheers. --Pastor of Muppets 02:51, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wow! That was fast!

I entered the article "Future of an Illusion" just a few minutes ago, and almost instantaneously, you added the wikify notice. How'd you do it so fast? And, based on my article, what needs changing? Also, what do I need to do to be an administrator? Are you an administrator?--Screwball23 ^talk 03:13, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Solar disinfection

You suggest wikifying Solar disinfection... I had considered just making it a redirect to [[Solar water disinfection, and that may be the better option. But I thought it could conceivably refer to something else, so I made that short, explanatory page. What do you suggest? --Singkong2005 10:10, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Scouting

Why did you remove the link to the Boer War? Just interested. Also maybe a link should be added for Afrikaner in that para. Cheers, Bduke 00:09, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

POV check tag at Shuttleworth Foundation

I removed a POV check tag that you added to Shuttleworth Foundation because there was no stated justification. What was it that you felt was POV? Theshibboleth 18:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Shaw

Good job on noticing that copyright violation. Could you put in the edit summary a little note? Thanks! --Masssiveego 01:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC) on RC patrol.[reply]

Sarah Howland

Hey there. I understand why you changed the prod to speedy, but wouldn't it have been better to have simply added db-bio in addition to prod, as recommended at WP:PROD? The article is actually somewhat asserting her notability thru her GPA or whatever. If the speedy fails on that or another basis, readding the prod template resets the countdown. Just something to keep in mind--no need to delete a prod tag just to add a speedy tag. NickelShoe (Talk) 18:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Remeber the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones interviews? It reached nothing even remotly resembling consensus, but it was deleted anyway? Please join the debate regarding undeleting it. I view this as nothing more as the majority imposing their will on the minority, in a blatant violation of the spirit of wikipedia --Striver 22:06, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AFD

Remeber the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones interviews? It reached nothing even remotly resembling consensus, but it was deleted anyway? Please join the debate regarding undeleting it. I view this as nothing more as the majority imposing their will on the minority, in a blatant violation of the spirit of wikipedia --Striver 22:02, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:CA-92.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CA-92.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If you created it yourself you could replace the {{PD}} tag with {{PD-self}}.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. -- Paddu 20:18, 5 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't remove contents!

Please stop removing content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DavidDurieux 23:39, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry!

Sorry about that. I did not realize that there was a copyright violation. --DavidDurieux 00:00, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

James Kritzeck

Hey Seano! Great job on wikifying James Kritzeck! Kukini 05:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Juozas Lukoševičius

Hello, it seems you have created this article about a year ago. I wonder what was your source because I could only find a minearologist who was born and died in the same years. I could not find any mentions of rockets. Could you help out? Renata 18:10, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:S Sarandon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:S Sarandon.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possible move of RMS Republic page?

Hi...I'm in the midst of a project to develop thorough and consistent documentation of all of the White Star Line ships over the years. I'm getting ready to deal with the several Republics, and since you've done a lot of editing on RMS Republic I wanted to touch base with you so as to not step on any toes, etc. Here's the situation: there is currently an entry for an SS Republic, an American steamboat which I'm proposing to rename SS Republic (1853). Then I will be writing an entry for the first White Star version, which will be SS Republic (1872). Now comes the part involving you...to keep things consistent with the naming trends that have come out of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Ships, I would like to propose moving RMS Republic to SS Republic (1903). This keeps things a bit more orderly, and uses the "SS" term which is more standard (the RMS term only actually being used while Royal Mail is aboard). Oh, and there will then be a disambiguation page under SS Republic as well. Thoughts? Akradecki 18:31, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Before I do anything, I'll check a little more on the RMS/SS issue. It may come down to technical/proper usage versus popular usage, and I'm not sure what the project group's opinion is. Thanks! Akradecki 21:24, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Palo-Alto-at-Sea.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Palo-Alto-at-Sea.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 22:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When if first uploaded the image it was on a California parks web page that said that all items on the page were public domain unless listed otherwise. The web page seems to have changed its copyright policy. I know the picture was taken in January, 1921, but I don’t know when it was first published. Seano1 22:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can you at least find the Web page again and give a URL on the image description page? —Bkell (talk) 03:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Camera filter

Hi. In the article Filter (photography) you removed "which can be several f-stop on a lens". You are absolutely correct, this was an inaccurate statement. However, when I added info about multi coating, I wanted to point out that putting a "bad" filter on a lens would slow it down, eg. making a f/2.8 comparable to a f/3.0, or something like that. Could it be rephrased instead of removed completely? Kricke 21:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it could be rephrased to be accurate. Seano1 21:49, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mac OS/HyperCard

You recently edited HyperCard with a comment that Apple never spun off the OS. I'm not sure this is entirely accurate either. IIRC, Claris sold and distributed the OS for some time? Maury 18:51, 10 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There's no mention of Mac OS being under Claris in the companies wikipedia article. That article also says that Apple created Claris so as not to compete with third party developers, doing that would not require moving the OS.

Sure it does, check it again. No, I didn't just add this. Maury 12:34, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t notice that before. Seano1 20:16, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Royal Mail Ship; Empress Airport; 47 Ursae Majoris; HMS Tamar (1863); Empress Hotel (Melbourne); Empress Dowager Yan Ming; Empress Zhang Huiguang; Almaden Research Center; List of ship launches in 1913; Dampfschiff General von Steuben; Combined gas and steam; Empress Lü (Houshao); RMS Baltic (1903); Huron Lightship; Benjamin Sehene; Turbo-electric; Majesty of the Seas; Empress/McNeill Conoco Phillips Airport; Diamond Princess (ship)

Cleanup: Imogen Cunningham; BMW M70; Chattel slavery
Merge: Victoria of the United Kingdom (disambiguation); Ballet San Jose Silicon Valley; Taiga
Add Sources: Direct descent from William I to Elizabeth II; SS Great Britain; Urban growth boundary
Wikify: Gherkin; USS Rockbridge (APA-228); Julie of the Wolves
Expand: Princess Sophia (steamer); List of British entomological publishers; Lil' J

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 23:38, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pike (weapon)

I reverted your change to Pike (weapon) as the pikemen referred to in the sentence you revised were Flemish and Scots, not just Scots, so "royal" is the accurate description.

"Also see"

Thanks for your edit to the New York Passenger Ship Terminal article. Generally we use the term "See also" instead of "Also see." Nitpicky, but for the future it may come in handy. Thanks!

Jarfingle 02:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Seacliff.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Seacliff.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 18:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial vessel template

Hello. As you may know, there are a variety of infobox templates used for ocean liners; at least one of which is ill-suited to passenger vessels. As a consequence of a discussion I had with User:Ebyabe at User_talk:Ebyabe#RMS_Queen_Mary, Ebyabe has generously agreed to create a template for passenger vessels. It appears at Template:Infobox Commercial Ship. Its creator needs assistance with the fields for the template. For example, it will need a tonnage field, but would not need a displacement field. Should beam be moulded breadth, or extreme beam? Should length be pp, or oa? Given your interest in this area, would you be willing to particpate in the project? If so, go to Template talk:Infobox Commercial Ship and weigh in. It may be that different templates are needed for passenger ships (gt), freighters (dwt, net), containerships (TEU) and that one size will not fit all. Thanks for your interest. Kablammo 21:18, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

You recently edited the article Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows with the comment (removed all the vandalism) where you actually vandalized the article. Why did you do that ? James Douglas 2007 22:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I must have gotten confused by edits that were don't while I was looking for the last good version, sorry. Seano1 05:21, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It seemed strange for a user with your track record to suddenly turn into a vandal :-) James Douglas 2007 16:43, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just cos

Nengscoz416 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

CfD nomination of Category:Shipwrecks in Pearl Harbor

Category:Shipwrecks in Pearl Harbor, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Black Falcon ^(Talk) 23:26, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Syt-beach.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Syt-beach.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kam Solusar (talk) 19:10, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Palo-Alto-(Ship).jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Palo-Alto-(Ship).jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 11:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:Syt-beach.jpg

File:Syt-beach.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Sylt beach.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Sylt beach.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding File:Donner Party Memorial.jpg

Hi, could you verify that you had released this image under the license stated? Could you also state the date this photo was taken? Thank you. Jappalang (talk) 02:57, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I took the photo in August of 2005 and released it under the listed license. Seano1 (talk) 05:41, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:32, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:15, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Large car listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Large car. Since you had some involvement with the Large car redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 03:34, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Seano1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Seano1. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:The tanker Palo Alto laying at Seacliff Beach.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The tanker Palo Alto laying at Seacliff Beach.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 07:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Seano1. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Palo-Alto-from-Beach-Near-Stern.jpg

Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is not present, please add {{claimed}} to the file description page, if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please update it to {{img-claimed}} if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If the {{Media by uploader}} tag is present, please add |claimed=yes to the tag, if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion

If media remains unclaimed for over a year, it may be removed to ensure Wikipedia stays in compliance with copyright and media licensing policy.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please claim your upload(s): File:Palo-Alto-from-Beach.jpg

Hi, This media was seemingly uploaded prior to current image polices,

However, due to changes in the copyright situation in some jurisdictions, there is a need to ensure media on English Wikipedia is correctly licensed and attributed. It would be appreciated if you were able to confirm that it was your own work, by marking it as {{own}}, Fully completeing the {{information}} block, and leaving an acknowledgement on the file description page to indicate that you've accepted the license shown (and updated the {{information}} accordingly. If you have other uploads, please consider "claiming" them in a similar manner, You can find a list of files you have created here.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is not present, please add {{claimed}} to the file description page, if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please update it to {{img-claimed}} if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If the {{Media by uploader}} tag is present, please add |claimed=yes to the tag, if you have carried out the steps noted above.

If you don't want to keep your media on English Wikipedia, please nominate it for deletion under Criteria G7 of the Criteria for Speedy deletion

If media remains unclaimed for over a year, it may be removed to ensure Wikipedia stays in compliance with copyright and media licensing policy.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:47, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:23, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for S Monterey Bay jpg

Perhaps on of the most beautiful photos in Wikidom. So beautiful that I had to visit the Author and say "thanks." It is now the wallpaper of my phone. MissMaryMack14 (talk) 19:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Image:GT40.jpg

Image:2004-Bremerhaven U-Boot-Museum-Sicherlich.jpg

Special thanks

Michael J. Bernard

Thanks

Wow! That was fast!

Solar disinfection

Scouting

POV check tag at Shuttleworth Foundation

Sandra Shaw

Sarah Howland

Recent comment at WP:AFD/Kristi Yamaoka (second nomination)

AFD

AFD

Image Tagging Image:CA-92.jpg

Don't remove contents!

Sorry!

James Kritzeck

Juozas Lukoševičius

Image Tagging for Image:S Sarandon.jpg

Possible move of RMS Republic page?

Unspecified source for Image:Palo-Alto-at-Sea.jpg

Camera filter

Mac OS/HyperCard

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Pike (weapon)

"Also see"

Unspecified source for Image:Seacliff.jpg

Commercial vessel template

Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

Just cos

CfD nomination of Category:Shipwrecks in Pearl Harbor

Image source problem with Image:Syt-beach.jpg

Image source problem with Image:Palo-Alto-(Ship).jpg

NowCommons: File:Syt-beach.jpg

Regarding File:Donner Party Memorial.jpg

You are now a Reviewer

ArbCom elections are now open!

Large car listed at Redirects for discussion

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

File:The tanker Palo Alto laying at Seacliff Beach.jpg listed for discussion

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Please claim your upload(s): File:Palo-Alto-from-Beach-Near-Stern.jpg

Please claim your upload(s): File:Palo-Alto-from-Beach.jpg

Thanks for S Monterey Bay jpg