Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strong defensive strategy criterion

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Keep. Death phoenix 21:37, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Strong defensive strategy criterion

This standalone article is original research, excessively technical, term invented/used only by Mike Ossipoff Whig 12:38, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The term is not that obscure. Also, Steve Eppley has defined criteria with the same purpose, just different names. If WDSC and SDSC are deleted, there won't be any articles for these concepts. The article can be made less technical. KVenzke 15:37, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
Keep and also merge voting for strong and weak, since its likely they'll get the same votes for both. 203.26.206.129 19:13, 25 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep agree with KVenzke Falphin 14:57, 26 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.