Talk:xine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Xine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Mid-importance).

Name

(from WP:RM)

Xine → xine

The name is misspelled, it should be all lowercase. DonDiego 14:49, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Is this a troll? Xine and xine are the same articles. How do you create an article entitled xine? -- ALoan (Talk) 15:01, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
  - It's a known limitation of Wikimedia software. See, for example, iMac. older≠wiser 15:21, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
    - Just add {{wrongtitle|title=xine}} to such pages. Angela. 03:14, Oct 30, 2004 (UTC)
      - Added to Wikipedia:List of pages whose correct title is not allowed by MediaWiki. anthony 警告 01:00, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Pronunciation

How is it pronounced--"zine" or "x-ine"? Massysett 21:38, 13 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It is pronounced "kseen". DonDiego 17:28, 18 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice feature

Xine is my favourite video player by far, and I've used it for over a year. But I still have a complaint about it's Wikipedia page.

"A nice feature of xine during playback of videos is the ability to manually correct the synchronization of audio and video if video is ahead of audio or vice versa." While I agree with that being a nice feature, isn't that a weasel word? Wikipedia articles aren't supposed to carry an opinin, and in this case, the opinion is that the feature is nice. Am I just being anal here or am I onto something? (And feel free to suggest a replacement for it if you agree with me).

DaBlade 15:07, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that should be removed, specially seeing as many other players support it too, it seems completely out of place. For example, in MPC and mplayer, you can use the + and -. I don't know about VLC, but I assume this is a standard feature.

Fair use rationale for Image:Xine logo.jpg

Image:Xine logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 12:25, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Marked a couple spots where sourcing is needed. Otherwise, a pretty good article. --Lendorien (talk) 16:32, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's true that the API (and, for that matter, the ABI) is considered stable, but additions are fine ‒ for example, 1.1.x doesn't have built-in VDR support because that would introduce API and ABI changes (it was me who said "no" to it). Good luck in finding something useful for citation purposes, though… — Dsalt (talk) 22:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Platform

The 'InfoBox' says it was "OS: Cross-Platform" while text says Unix-like. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.231.163.121 (talk) 10:48, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They're both true (FSVO true). xine-lib is supposed to be compilable and usable on Windows, but developer support for this is lacking... — Dsalt (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drop the KDE example

Under xine#xine backend, the article uses the Phonon backend as an example of a xine application. However, the project page says that the project is depreciated and no longer in development. This example, therefore, may be misleading and should probably be replaced with another example of xine implementation. BordenRhodes (talk) 22:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]