Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduoption

Eduoption was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was to delete.

Original research? Advertising? Vanity? There are 113 Google hits for "eduoption", almost all referring to eduoption.com. Rick K 05:41, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)

Kill it. Kill it now. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality (hopefully!)]] 05:51, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
Delete, my guess is advertising more than vanity. Shane King 06:23, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Advertising. --*drew 06:59, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. —tregoweth 07:22, Nov 21, 2004 (UTC)
Delete: Jargon. I'm not sure it's advertising, quite, but it's either that or a neologism. Geogre 16:01, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete Advertising. --LeeHunter 18:55, 21 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Neat neologism. I have a new one: dextreet. Hmm, maybe not. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 04:03, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Delete. - Ta bu shi da yu 04:57, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.