User talk:Hajhouse

Messages for me

Thanks for your copyediting -- it's appreciated! BCorr|Брайен 04:46, Mar 27, 2004 (UTC)

move

Hi, you copied the contents of Suit (clothes) to Suit (clothing). It is recommended that instead of copying text you "move" a page (there is a "move" button at the top), this way also the edit history and the talk page is preserved. (See also Help:Moving a page) --128.139.226.37 16:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip! I never saw that button until you pointed it out.

Permission

Hello, I wanted to use your organic farming picture in a website that my college class is putting online. I know that it's in public domain but the webmaster of our site wants your name and some proof of dialogue that we contacted those who took the pictures we are using, so that she knows from whom we got all our pictures from. If you could email me that would be best (I should have an email feature) as soon as you can I would appreciate it, thanks so much! --msmgore 22:17, 18 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do we really need "Red" next to a red diagram

Re your recent change to Daylight saving time:

Do we really need to label a red region "red"? For all but blind readers its obvious; and blind readers cannot see the map so they cannot use the fact that it's red. Eubulides 17:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's helpful because not all browsers in current use support the unicode characters used in the legend. The colored boxes do not display properly in such browsers.

Which browsers are those? I just checked the first 10 Wikipedia pages that use the "legend" template, namely, Alphabet, Asia, Afghanistan, Anschluss, American Civil War, Antarctic Treaty System, Austria-Hungary, Black Sea, Battle of Stalingrad, and Balkans. None of them have the name of the color next to the color in the legend. The browser problem you mention is therefore going to be shared by a lot of Wikipedia pages, and it should be fixed in the implementation of "legend" rather than in all its uses. (Also, on a monochrome display, saying "red" and "blue" is actually incorrect.) Eubulides 06:52, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal Types of restaurants with Restaurant

Hello,
Looking at your nomination in regards to these articles, you failed to properly set up the merge proposal. You need to tag both the articles: {{mergeto}} on the article that you want to eliminate and {{mergefrom}} on the one you want to merge the information into.

I set up the {{mergefrom}} template on the restaurant article and put the merge proposal discussion on the talk page, so please put your reasons for proposing the merger and any comments you would like to make.

Thanks,
Jeremy (Jerem43 18:58, 13 October 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Sheridan, California

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Sheridan, California, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. -- Pepve 22:28, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Bricsys

A tag has been placed on Bricsys requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pastordavid (talk) 19:13, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your user page

I found your old user page while checking out some old deleted contributions. I have history merged it, so that all edits are in one place. Hope you don't mind. Graham87 16:22, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

United States Geographical MOS

A while back ago, you were involved in a discussion about how to refer to the United States Geographical locations on wikipedia. A similar discussion is taking place here. Any comments on this topic would be helpful.--Jojhutton (talk) 00:49, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Breakfast

Hello, Hajhouse. You are invited to join WikiProject Breakfast, a WikiProject and resource dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of breakfast-related topics. To join the project, just add your name to the member list. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:30, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

World Market listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World Market. Since you had some involvement with the World Market redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:42, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Edge of Dawn for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Edge of Dawn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edge of Dawn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JayJay^{What did I do?} 02:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hajhouse. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]