User talk:Burwellian


Main	Talk	Email

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! -- Graham ☺ | Talk 13:37, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Page vandalism

To however keeps vadalising my friends User Page with your "see the truth" junk, it isnt big and it sure as heck isnt funny. Go add your gibberish on your own user page or something Jennytablina 09:54, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United Kingdom

Why do you feel that stating that the UK is one of the world's most powerful nations is pushing a POV? A nation which has the world's fourth largest economy, second largest navy and considerable cultural reach (all mentioned further down the article in great detail) is surely a powerful country? This is said in the article on the USA in the introduction and it should also be emphasised in the UK article. (Ouip) (12th Jan 06).

The economy is mentioned later on, as is the navy so they aren't needed in the intro which is long enough already. The previous version mentioning the Empire seemed pro-Brit pov whilst the final line of your edit can also be seen as pov. - JVG 11:53, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

population

hi, i saw you entered population statistics for Littleport, Cambridgeshire, i assume you got the data from http://www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001, please could you explain how you found that data, i want pop for [caxton, cambridgeshire]] and bourn, but i cant find it anywhere thanks Bluemoose 11:26, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Westport

Thanks a lot for dropping in to the Westport, County Mayo article! It seems there are quite a few Westport exiles in the UK on Wikipedia!--File Éireann 17:57, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Proteus infobox

Thank you very much for getting the Proteus infobox going. I had gotten started on it in a sandbox of mine, but I find those kinds of tables very troublesome to edit. --arkuat (talk) 02:42, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New category

Of possible interest, [[Category:Wikipedians who are pilots]]. Best regards, CHAIRBOY (☎) 18:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gay rights in Iraq

You listed yourself as Roman Catholic so I thought I might bring this unencyclopedic total POV pushing article to your attention. It is currently up for deletion here. Chooserr 00:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting GWB

The rollback button makes it easy, but I almost always get the edit conflict trying to add the {{test}} templates to a George W. Bush vandal's talk page. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 12:08, Dec. 20, 2005

Fallen

Well done. Thanks :-) Jogers 13:38, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dia Duit

Hi there! If you're ever short of a few subjects to do, we'd be more than happy to see you at Wikipedia:Irish Wikipedians' notice board. There's not that many of us, and we need all the help and opinions we can get. Cheers!Fergananim 21:26, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted template substitution

I've edited your page semi-automatically to substitute the deleted template {{user bad EU}}. // Pathoschild (_admin / ^talk) 00:00, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

The Game

I just lost the game.Sumthingweird 13:06, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, I did too - Sir Grant the Small 20:34, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Crossing a flag

I would like to ask you not to cross an official flag on your user page. Imagine someone did that to that of your country. This is even considered a crime in many countries. I just regard that as bad manners. I am sure you are able to express your reasonable opinion in a respectful way. ROGNNTUDJUU! 20:41, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are not, however, free to forcibly impose your views upon others. I appreciate you raising the issue but it may be worth looking at the background of the person before you complain that they are being disrespectful to a flag. You asked me to imagine if someone did that to a flag of my own country when the crossed flag was of a entity to which my country belongs. You could find that out quite easily from the other Userboxes on my page (esp. the one saying I'm from the UK) and by looking up the members of the EU, who's flag was the one crossed on my page. - JVG 15:14, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to answer. I do not want to impose my views upon others. I am perfectly ok if someone expresses concerns about the EU or any other union. I am concerned myself about the agricultural subsidies and antidumping cases in the EU and US, for example. I however think that there are more respectful ways to express concerns than crossing out a flag many people fill represented by. I am sorry if I missed your user box when posting at your page. I just thought it would be more respectful to tell every user the reason why I listed the image for deletion as it was solely used for a user box that had already been deleted for being disruptive and was set up again on personal pages. What I got out of this is a massive amount of delete votes for a respect template I created and a massive keep vote for the respectless crossed out EU flag. But I also convinced some users that there are nicer ways to express their legitimate opinion, and I am thus sure that I achieved at least something. Have a good time here. ROGNNTUDJUU! 23:06, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SOS save our Anglophiles!!

This user is an Anglophile

Hi! :) i'm the maker of the Francophile/Japanophile userboxes. I'm contacting you to warn you that our fancy userboxes are in danger. Someone has decided to delete them and to replace them by a category "Wikipedians interested in UK" for Anglophile wich is totally weird, as England is not UK! Well you can support the "Anglophile/Francophile/Japanophile categories" by posting a "Keep" comment on the Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2006 August 16. The quicker the better, as the more we are to support it, the bigger the chance we still have is. (everyone can vote, not only those who have the userbox). Thanks. Cliché Online 01:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
p.s.: in order to find the thread more easily once in the Deletion Vote article, just press & hold Ctrl and press F (Find) on your keyboard to display the Search screen, then type Anglophile and you're in! ;) Cliché Online 01:43, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

Your user page got blanked again - I've just reverted it, but you might like to add another one to your vandalism count! (I, incidentally, live just round the corner from you, in Reach. Small world, isn't it!) Squeezeweasel 17:14, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Thanks, I try to do my best :-) - Myanw 15:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey

Hey - this is Sabrina. Love is a Rose was modified by my mentor. He removed the lyrics and changed some things. It still needs some work, but I'm not sure what else I need to put.
If you have any ideas I'd be very thankful.
Oh, and can pages on things like singles ever be more than a stub?
Okies, have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 14:50, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okies, thank you. OH! I have over 500 edits...nearing 570! I'm so happy.
Have a wonderful day!
Saber girl08 13:33, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ipswich Town F.C.

No problem. I wouldn't normally edit other clubs' templates, but the Ipswich one appeared to be quite out of date. Dean Bowditch wasn't listed on the ITFC official site as a squad member and his article (at the time) still listed him as on loan at Northampton, so I assumed that this must still be the case. Andy Rhodes also isn't listed as a player on the ITFC website, so I assume that means that he's not registered as a player any more - I'll leave it up to you to try to work that one out, you'll probably have more luck than me, me being an outsider!

It looks like the template (and maybe the individual player pages) could do with being monitored so that they can be kept up to date - maybe you would like to volunteer for the job? Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 00:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're right - funnily enough, I've just been on a crusade updating all of the Football League season articles pre-1929 (the year that Sheffield Wednesday was officially registered) that were ALL incorrect. I'll have a look at the main article too.

I'm not sure when Bolton changed their name, but I could probably find out with a few internet searches... Dan1980 (talk | stalk) 00:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wow

Okay, so you've been around here longer than me by a long chalk but recently I've seen you take interest in the ITFC articles. I was wondering if you'd take some time at the WP:FAC for History of Ipswich Town F.C. as I'm sure you can contribute to and improve the article. I'm working on an ITFC featured topic and this is the last article.... All suggestions welcome! The Rambling Man (talk) 22:22, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I guess you haven't looked at the sources for all of the ITFC featured content - Pride of Anglia is the number one reference! Anyway, thanks for your suggestion, if you have the time to contribute at the FAC then cool. Either way, happy editing! The Rambling Man (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well in case you hadn't noticed, the history article is the last on my list for an ITFC featured topic - Ipswich Town F.C., History of Ipswich Town F.C., Ipswich Town F.C. seasons, List of Ipswich Town F.C. managers, List of Ipswich Town F.C. Players of the Year, List of Ipswich Town F.C. statistics and records and Portman Road. Pride of Anglia features pretty heavily - I've been in touch with the webmaster quite a bit! The Rambling Man (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Carrow Road

Hi. Thanks for the tags. As per Template:Fact/doc#Contraindications, you'd probably be better off using the {{unreferenced}} tag instead of littering with cn tags, unless you're planning to fix the problem yourself. A scattering of cn tags often aggreives other editors and can look pointy and there's no (erm) point in riling people when we're just trying to improve the encyclopedia. Incidentally, if you were looking to fix this yourself, there's a lot of referenced material on this topic in the relevant section of the FA Norwich City F.C.. Cheers, --Dweller (talk) 16:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Wembley Stadium matches

Not sure why you left me a note on its prodding. I didn't create the article. - Dudesleeper / Talk 23:02, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aorangi Terrace/Henman Hill

Following on from your comment here, would you like to vote in the move request? --Philip Stevens (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:49, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cambridge meetup 14 November

Another Cambridge meetup is set for the afternoon of Saturday 14 November. Please contribute to the page and come along if you can. Charles Matthews (talk) 20:18, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday

Have a brilliant birthday, Burwellian! All the best of luck and health in the year ahead. This wish was brought to you by the letters B, D and C. —what a crazy random happenstance 07:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Transcribed from User Talk:Senra re:Burwell.

East Cambs stuff

Hello from South Wales! As my username Burwellian suggests, I grew up in Burwell and have gotten a bit fed up of the state the village page is in. Again. I've tried half heartedly a few times to make a decent article out of it (about half of the content there before yesterday was my own doing over the past few years) but have lacked a bit of direction until looking at WP:UKCITIES the other day and seeing the Little Thetford article. I was curious if you've got any suggestions, advice, etc that could be benefitted from? I'd advise a hard hat if you're going onto the article at the moment as it's a mess as I'm kinda using the actual article for drafting as well, hence the in use template... - JVG (talk) 17:34, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am flattered that you are asking me for advice though I am really no expert. My initial approach was two-steps forward, one-step back. Like you I then found WP:UKCITIES which helped enormously. For Little Thetford I used the editorial facilities available to us all at Wikipedia: WP:RFF, WP:PR, then WP:GAN, WP:PR (again) and finally WP:FAC. The FAC was an horrendous process! Given the above, I can provide some overall comments which I hope you take constructively as intended

The lead does not summarise the article well. I would suggest leaving this until last. One point I would make about the lead. Who says it is large? Although the word large is not mentioned in MOS:words to watch, I would be careful of using it unless a WP:RS says it. Litteport is large and is verifiably so!
Bare external links should not be in the main body of the article - see WP:EL. At the very least convert them all to references using <ref>[http://somethwhere]</ref> but better is to use a relevant {{Citation}} template. If a link is not appropriate to convert to a reference it should be in the external links section. Avoid links in the external links section that are also referenced in the article
Much of the article is unreferenced. If you cannot find supporting sources with inline references for every paragraph or potentially contentious statement then such paragraphs and statements should be removed
The governance section seems inappropriatly political for an encyclopaedia. I recommemd cutting a lot of it. Consider what would need to be modified if there was a change in political party and remove all such detail - see Wikipedia:MOS#Chronological_items
Consider using prose instead of lists as per Wikipedia:MOS#Bulleted_and_numbered_lists
The Burwell Museum section is probably too WP:ADVERT and should be cut or significantly reduced

I have not looked at other article details such as prose, images, WP:RS nor WP:VERIFY. My above observations may assist getting through the editorial process (WP:PR, WP:GAN and WP:FAC) a little easier. I consider WP:RFF an earlier editorial process which I suspect is not needed here. I hope it helps. Feel free to drop me a line any time if you feel I can help further. Good luck

--Senra (Talk) 19:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All useful; Governance was knocked together this afternoon but I'm aware it's pretty political so will prob revisit it anyway. I've barely attacked the lead yet and was kind of intending to leave it til last except it kept bugging me so I redid the first para at least. External links and references are also issues I've spotted, and the Museum is why I've tagged it as unsuitable and singled that very point out on the rather long to do list I've put on the talk page! The lists are mainly my notes to tell me what I'm planning to write in, so won't be staying :) Cheers for the reply, I'll copy this onto my own user talk page so I can refer to it easier if you don't mind? - JVG (talk) 21:18, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Just been thinking (dangerous I know). The resources listed on my user page my be of use to you as they have mainly been developed for places and churches. Additionally, consider reviewing British Geology Survey for your geology section, specifically Geology Viewer and Heritage Gateway for local archaeology information

Oh thank you! Geology's the one bit I'm kinda dreading doing; love geography, but my geology is more than a little bit rusty. How does the Governance section seem now by the way? - JVG (talk) 22:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better. Personally, I would remove Paice entirely due chronology and put Pym into the notable people section --Senra (Talk) 22:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just checked the geology (I am not a geologist so you need to check this somewhere else too). According to Geology of Britain viewer, Burwell sits on an chalk outcrop. More specifically, it sits on a north-east to south-west running West Melbury Marly chalk formation with the southern most part of the village outcropped by a zig zag chalk formation.

Icknield Way probably passes nearby or through Burwell? That has historical roots (Iron Age?) and is a modern ramblers walk

News?

The Times Tuesday 11 July 1786 p. 3, col.3 Extract of a letter from Cambridge, July 7th: Murder in Burwell
The Times Saturday 8 March 1851 p. 8, col. F A riot in The Fens

--Senra (Talk) 15:05, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Worssam, B C (1975) [1969]. Geology of the Country around Cambridge:Explanation of One-inch Geological Sheet 188, New Series (2 ed.). London: HMSO. p. 130. ISBN 011880068. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: length (help); Invalid |ref=harv (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help) {{quote|text=The principal locally-produced building stone is Burwell Stone, or Burwell Rock, from the [geological] horizon of the Totternhoe Stone in the Lower Chalk. Penning and Jukes-Browne (1881, p. 46) remarked of Carter's Pit, Burwell, that the lowest beds exposed were used only for interior work but that the over-lying 'bond' stone, 3 ft thick, if properly dried became very hard and made a good building stone. In a pit just to the south a block of it weighing 5 tons, and measuring roughly 100 cu ft, had been obtained. The blocks were shaped with a tool somewhat like a two-edged battle-axe, and allowed to get thoroughly dry before being used for building. In 1952 the 'bond' stone had been worked out at Carter's Pit, but compact unjointed chalk from below its level was being worked for external repairs to Woburn Abbey.

--Senra (Talk) 15:39, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Icknield Way passes just to the south, but will get a mention due to Bronze age findings on the Heath in the south of the parish as well; the A11 certainly looks like a Roman Road too and remains of a Roman villa are known in the village, but can't find a name for the Roman Road. The parish may only extend as far south as the A14 now, but it used to cover part of the racecourse as far as the old A11. The murder is news to me but the riot isn't, I still need to work the details of that out though. Chalk sounds right; there's that and clunch in the area and a few quarries, plus an obvious ridge extending north of the village towards Burwell Broad and Soham... *copies sources to Burwell talk page* - JVG (talk) 16:44, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Burwellian. You have new messages at Senra's talk page.
Message added 15:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Some images for you. I also have an image of the "Places to visit in Burwell" and "Welcome to Burwell Castle" signs, both produced by Cambridgeshire County Council. They are not suitable for uploading to commons. If you drop me an email, I will send you them both (for your research only of course). Senra (Talk) 15:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Burwellian. You have new messages at Senra's talk page.
Message added 18:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Just added some more stuff - I am about done now. If you need anything specific, just ask. By the way, if you have expanded the article five-fold or more within the last five days why not submit it to Did you know? Perhaps you could use "Did you know that ... the 51kg bell of the St Mary the Virgin Church clock was made by the Whitechapel Bell Foundry - the oldest manufacturing company in Great Britain?" Senra (Talk) 18:01, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have a copy of Franklin, William (2005), Burwell The history of a Fen-edge Village, King's Lynn, Norfolk: Heritage and Marketing Publications Limited, ISBN 0954445694 if you need anything from it, just let me know. It is due back 9 November 2010 and can be renewed (if no one requests it) three times. Chapters are

Topography and Archaeology
The Development of the Village
The Period of Turmoil
Manors
Medieval Life
Churches and Chapels
Open Fields
The Post-Medieval Burwell
The Enclosure
Fen Drainage

--Senra (Talk) 19:23, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback2

Hello, Burwellian. You have new messages at Gigs's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Happy Birthday

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Burwellian, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!

Burwell, Cambridgeshire

Hi there! (I would've put these comments on User talk:Burwellian/Burwell, but it looks like space has been reserved. :P

So, on my cursory review of your draft, I'll list my comments below...

Nice work on expanding such an article, though; it is difficult to put so much into such a small town!

Frankly, it is amazing that you've been able to find this many sources about Burwell. On a preliminary run-through, it seems like you've got all the content readily outlined. The only thing I can really suggest for you is that, if you want to put Burwell through GA, you'll need to format the references in some manner. Take a look at Template:Cite web and its sister templates.

Presently, I find that the actual Burwell article meets the criteria to be C-class. My primary concern is that it is not comprehensive, but it looks like you are well on track to fixing that problem, especially given the extensiveness of the subpage variant of the Burwell article. Nice work on achieving your short-term goal. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 05:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! -129.49.72.78 (talk) 18:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

BVC

Hi I was just looking at your user page (being a former Burwellian myself) and noticed your draft article for Burwell Village College. It may be worth mentioning in this article that BVC was not always a primary school. In the 1970's/early 80's Burwell followed the Suffolk system of schools (primary, middle and upper). At this time BVC was the middle school (age 9 to 13 if I recall correctly) and there were two primary schools (Ness Road - now a housing estate, and Parsonage Close, which I think is now sheltered housing). I think it must have been around 1984 when BVC became a primary school. I have no citations for this (I only know because I was there!) but there may be something in some council archives. I hope I am not teaching you to suck eggs/stating the obvious as you may already know all this! --RE73 (talk) 07:10, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was aware of it not always being a primary, so was as least partly aware of the old set up; I lived for a few years on the former school site on Ness Road and I know some of my teachers at primary had been teaching in the village since before the school was a primary. I'll need to find sources for it, but the main village article is my main priority tbh! Thanks though :) - JCJ (talk) 08:47, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Happy Birthday, Burwellian, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day!

Andie (talk) 12:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday, Burwellian, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a nice day! Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 21:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome from STiki!

Hello, Burwellian, and welcome to STiki! Thank you for your recent contributions using our tool. We at STiki hope you like using the tool and decide to continue using it in the future. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Information about STiki, including:
- Using STiki and its hotkeys
- Comparison to other tools
Information about vandalism on Wikipedia

Here are some pages which are a little more fun:

The STiki leaderboard - See how you are faring against other STiki users!
Userboxes - Do not hesitate to wear the STiki label with pride by choosing from a selection of userboxes!

We hope you enjoy maintaining Wikipedia with STiki! If you have any questions, problems, or suggestions don't hesitate to drop a note over at the STiki talk page and we'll be more than happy to help. Again, welcome, and thanks! West.andrew.g (talk) 05:13, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback 3

Hello, Burwellian. You have new messages at Redrose64's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Redrose64 (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article Feedback deployment

Hey Burwellian; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:06, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Territorial control of the ISIS.svg

A tag has been placed on File:Territorial control of the ISIS.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ground developments to football stadiums in the English football league system, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Dell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help us improve wikimeets by filling in the UK Wikimeet survey!

Hello! I'm running a survey to identify the best way to notify Wikimedians about upcoming UK wikimeets (informal, in-person social meetings of Wikimedians), and to see if we can improve UK wikimeets to make them accessible and attractive to more editors and readers. All questions are optional, and it will take about 10 minutes to complete. Please fill it in at:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/JJMNVVD

Thanks! Mike Peel (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 12:38, 14 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 02:41, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Burwellian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Just a happy birthday message to you, Burwellian, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! Lepricavark (talk) 19:59, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Survey Invite

I'm working on a study of political motivations and how they effect editing. I'd like to ask you to take a survey. The survey should take 5 minutes. Your survey responses will be kept private. Our project is documented at https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Research:Wikipedia_%2B_Politics.

Survey Link: http://uchicago.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH?Q_DL=1R1zIzg92FHco4d_80J3UDCpLnKyWTH_MLRP_8B9qwJqbjK0dPYF&Q_CHL=gl

I am asking you to participate in this study because you are a frequent editor of pages on Wikipedia that are of political interest. We would like to learn about your experiences in dealing with editors of different political orientations.

Sincere thanks for your help! Porteclefs (talk) 21:25, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Burwellian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Burwellian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Have a very happy birthday on your special day!

Best wishes, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Origin of the name " Windy City"" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Origin of the name " Windy City". The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 13#Origin of the name " Windy City" until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 20:37, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Wishing Burwellian a very happy birthday on behalf of the Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:13, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

Here's to you on your birthday, Burwellian! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!--Chris Troutman (talk) 23:55, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Birthday!

"Our Nige" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Our Nige has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 12 § Our Nige until a consensus is reached. Jalen Folf (talk) 20:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]