Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catto
- Can't see this ever becoming anything but a stub. Deb 20:41, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Weak keep. A lack of content regarding an article isn't enough to outright delete it; perhaps changing the article into a disambiguation page about the two names would be in order. [[User:Mo0|Mo0[talk]]] 21:14, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Never heard of it - doesn't appear to be that common. And even if it is common, it belongs in Wiktionary, not Wikipedia. David Johnson 21:40, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: not a common nickname, not useful content, not informative. Geogre 22:08, 23 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, not encyclopedic. --fvw* 00:27, 2004 Nov 24 (UTC)
- Delete... I know a lot of Catherines, but none that go by Catto. --Idont Havaname 04:17, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a baby name book. --Improv 04:32, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- delete this one. I know a lot of Catherines but none that goes by Catto. Dunc|☺ 11:52, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Do not merge. Do not redirect. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 22:44, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Delete, no redirect or merge. Almost certainly vanity. -Sean Curtin 00:10, Nov 25, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. [[User:Squash|Squash (Talk)]] 06:35, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
- Why does anyone care?