User talk:Chicago god
Way to remove an appropriate edit via Huggle on the Lancaster General page. If you're going to use an automated tool, please ensure that you pay attention to what you're editing.
24.19.44.58 (talk) 06:15, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for pulling those edits, i was getting pretty tired of company stooges pulling that. i put in an enormous number of citations and internal documents if you'd like to have a read. perhaps removing the ability for anonymous users to edit that page would be helpful.
Sgeine (talk) 18:55, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
can you please remove the ability to edit helio's page by anonymous users? its getting a bit ridiculous. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgeine (talk • contribs) 07:59, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
From: 69.178.92.85 To: God My comments are only stating the truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.178.92.85 (talk) 07:22, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
What needs to be included on the Making the Band SWHS page? It's definitely worthy of being on wikipedia, and I'm sure it has met your requirements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Miniyou64 (talk • contribs) 01:47, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
From: needtoupdatestuff re: Deborah Bialosky page Hi, I thought my statement for the reason of her being up there was due to the relevance of her family members, Marshall Bialosky a multi award winning ASCAP composer and professor at Dominquez and her brother Adam who is the attorney for the Dept. of Treasury. I can't imagine why her being the Oakland deputy attorney isn't relevant. Afterall, you have some pretty shady entertainment people on Wikipedia lying about their relevance who have people write stuff for them. Please advise if you missed this information I typed in the reason for edits summary when I created the page. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Needtoupdatestuff (talk • contribs) 02:48, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm working on it! I just created it seconds ago. --➨Candlewicke :) Sign/Talk 23:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
Admittedly, I am quick on the trigger button. I think most would agree that your improvements to the article have made it beneficial to the site. Chicago god (talk) 08:24, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
Kuo Yao-chi
[edit]Saying that he is a former minister of a national agency of the ROC definately asserts notability. The tag is gone. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
You're right, a speedy delete request was premature. My initial criticism of this article should have been presented through the AFD process. However, even that seems unnecessary now. Chicago god (talk) 08:26, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
It is clear you do not understand the policies on what can be speedily deleted. I have refused the speedy deletion of Maz Quinn on the grounds that notability is claimed (a four-times national champion in one of the world's top surfing nations), and clear secondary references are cited. Pleased take more care with your new page patrolling. If you wish to pursue this article further, I suggest you make a full afd of it - where I am sure the result will be a snowball keep. It appears from the comments above that this is not the onlyn incorrect {{db}} template you have placed today. please read Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion before placing any more! Grutness...wha? 23:51, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
I do have a good understanding of the policies, but improvement of those understandings is always possible. Even with 99.9% accuracy (and agreement), an eager editor could fall astray 10 times in 10,000 edits. In this case, I agree with you. Any initial criticism of the article would have been better handled through an AFD on grounds of notability. With your improvements, however, that action is not necessary. Chicago god (talk) 08:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
- You're doing good work on new pages patrol in general (so sorry for my annoyed tone before!) - just a bit overzealous here and there. Thake a break for a coffee every now and again :) Grutness...wha? 11:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
VP
[edit] |
An image created by you has been promoted to valued picture status Your image, File:Chicago Pumping Station Rev.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Valued picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Extra 999 (Contact me + contribs) 11:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
|
Speedy deletion nomination of Little Joe's Circle Lounge
[edit]
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
A tag has been placed on Little Joe's Circle Lounge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject of the article is important or significant: that is, why an article about it should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you can assert the notability of the subject, 
. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
See the guidelines for specific types of articles: biographies, websites, bands, or companies. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 02:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Raid-ant.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Raid-ant.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:54, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
Anything lacking a reliable source can be reverted by anyone at anytime
[edit]Regarding this edit [1], you'll need to add reliable sources if you want the material to stand. 142.166.214.64 (talk) 21:39, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)