Jump to content

Talk:K3 surface

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Why call this a stub? Seems to me that this is not a stub.

Charles Matthews 18:57, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This seems to have been edited in such a way as to slur over a point. The holonomy-type definition, as far as I can tell, is a broader one than the algebraic geometry definition. Charles Matthews 19:18, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thus physicists. Actually, this definition can't be right, if wikipedia's definition of hyperkahler manifold is correct - Sp(1) is exactly SU(2), so this definition implies every hyperkahler manifold is a K3 surface. I hope this change satisfies. Orthografer 05:46, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:56, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

K3 non algebraic

[edit]

In the article it says that most K3 surfaces are not algebraic, shouldn't it say non-projective?  franklin  05:13, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Language

[edit]

This article should be written in ENGLISH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.184.234 (talk) 21:14, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Snark won't help improve the article.--345Kai (talk) 18:51, 13 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
In all seriousness, should we have such a prominent, non-English quotation (Andre Well) at the top-right of the article with no translation on the English Wikipedia? I recommend replacing this with an English translation. Can anybody help? Steevven1 (Talk) (Contribs) (Gallery) 00:24, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Now added a translation of his quote. — Sasuke Sarutobi (push to talk) 14:39, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on K3 surface. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Complex compact surfaces with trivial canonical bundle

[edit]

It is said that the only complex compact surfaces with trivial canonical bundle are K3 or tori. I think there are primary Kodaira surfaces too. 195.221.123.15 (talk) 07:03, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]