Talk:Shaggy Rogers

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Animation: American / Television / Hanna-Barbera Mid‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Hanna-Barbera work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article lacks sufficient references and adequate inline citations. Once the references are added, please remove the `\|unref=` parameter from this template.
	This article has been marked as describing a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style and may require cleanup. Please provide that the fiction more clearly and provide non-fictional perspective.

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

United States: Animation / Television Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Beatnik/hippie

He's a beatnik who dresses like a hippie? Are you sure? Taco Deposit | Talk-o to Taco 22:14, Mar 1, 2005 (UTC)

I was just leaving in the "beatnik/hippie" remark when I originally updated this entry. While I suppose technically Shaggy's got mannerisms of both, he doesn't really dress like either one (goatee aside). Anthony Dean 05:29, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

Shaggy was developed as a somewhat typical 1969 teenager, with many hippie influences. Beatniks were the hipsters of the 50s, so that term would not be apt. But in the end, they are all hipsters.196.215.18.76 (talk) 11:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source of his behavior?

I'm sure it probably doesn't need to be asked, being that it's been parodied in just about every way imaginable in movies and references...

Shaggy, being a hippy/hipster, exhibits many of the signs of Marihuana use, though this aspect is never referred to or shown. Other possibilities are that he partakes of psychotropic substances, as well.

My rationale is such:

He's always ravenously hungry. Weed stoners typically go for carbohydrate based foods: Sandwiches, pizza, chips, Scooby snacks, and so on (Agreed, one doesn't necessarily have to be a stoner to be hungry like this, myself as a prime example).

He's usually the first one to see the monster/ghost.

He responds to his dog as if it were actually speaking to him (this could be seen as sort of an internal monologue on the part of Scooby, not actually spoken to the other characters). He responds to Scooby more than the other characters. The fact that they sometimes also have discussions with the dog indicates that they're not completely innocent, either. This is really quite consistent with the times, where two just-turned-men are driving around the country in a VW microbus with two unmarried girls, with no home or sources of income is perfectly ok. It also leads to the obvious question of "Where do they get the money to buy their stuff? How do they eat? How do they pay for gas?"

JD 06:01, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Followup! Ok, I know this is silly of me, but I actually read the "Adult Themes" section of the main scooby doo page, and realised I redundantly covered this all redundantly. Of course, the issue of money still comes up.

Probable answers include: 1. Daphne's family, as shown in various spinoffs, is quite wealthy, so she might pick up the tab for things like air fare, etc., 2. The reward money from capturing various crooks-disguised-as-phony-ghosts, etc., or 3. Half the time, their trips involve staying with relatives or friends, which would cut back on the costs. Anthony Dean 18:34, May 12, 2005 (UTC)

In refferance to the above. No air fares, they drive everywhere, hence the van, and the tiny van is probably pretty fuel efficent, shaggy's uncle is also pretty rich too.

As to drug use: I mean Scoobie doobie doo, it's right there in the name. The way scooby and shaggy do anything for a scoobie snack, it's pretty clear those things are hash cakes. and why are those 2 in the back, when the other 3 are up front, smoking a joint no doubt... Oh, btw scooby snack aren't mentioned in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.107.249.207 (talk) 00:02, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy's behavior does not stem from drug use, but from the fact that he is an omnipotent being who exists in the eighth dimension. He is often under the intense pressure of being an entity above God Himself since Shaggism (Religion of Shaggy) has become prominent once more after a 2000 year hiatus. With such a large surge in popularity, The Almighty Gobbler, Shaggy is under stress, causing overwhelmingly epic behavior. Legend has it that he only used 13% of his power to create the universe itself over 18 billion years ago.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Uwuyeet (talk • contribs) 04:44, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy's German?

I've removed this dubious category since the article doesn't appear to give an explanation.Psychonaut3000 19:46, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Scooby - Relative?

Can Scooby be considered a relative, since he is a dog, and not actually related to Shaggy; he's more of a friend. Cool Blue^{talk to me} 17:07, 12 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

Could we get a picture of the "classic" Shaggy? This modern 'What's New Scooby Doo'-version is not what most people have in mind when they think of him. Es-won 20:43, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Other characters interacting with Scooby

I seem to remember Velma talking to Scooby and reacting to his verbal responses or at the very least him nodding. Does anyone else remember this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Edbles (talk • contribs) 20:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you've seen much of the various series, as I have, you would notice that EVERYONE (not just the gang) reacts to Scooby on a regular basis. For example, a recurring joke is the tendency for people to sometimes confuse what he says and repeat it trying to figure it out, due to Scooby adding R to his words. They also seem to react to his cowardly ways, grabbing him and pulling him back when he says he is going to run away. They also treat Scooby though he was both a dog and a human, giving him human privilges and feeding him human foods, and I don't recall them feeding him dog food either, but they also feed him from a dog dish sometimes. Lastly, I have no idea where the whole drug use thing came about, but as a show aimed a young viewers, it's VERY unlikely that this would happen or parents and the FCC would be all over the Scooby writers.24.131.170.13 (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Red/green shirt

Should'nt there be a metion of Times shaggy where's a red shirt instead of green? Charecter wise a red shirt meant shaggy was either in charge of the group or generally braver than when he wears green. Shaggy also doesn't appear to wear any socks also, at least most of the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.215.242.231 (talk) 05:36, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plot Hole

One plot Hole in the 1960's series-one epsiode shows Shaggy swimming and diving to solve a mystery; yet another epsiode has Shaggy calling for help because he can't swim! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.53.145.121 (talk) 14:16, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah its a pretty big plot hole much like his being a vegan in the later episodes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.233.221.217 (talk) 01:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Shaa gi.jpg

Image:Shaa gi.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 05:37, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gender/sexuality

"Mixed". You're joking right?--92.41.198.42 (talk) 23:13, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Sexuality article must go!. It's far too OTT. (Mhawkins968 (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Agreed. It's someone trying to make an issue of a nonissue. The editor who put it back and demanded discussion hasn't shown up here. I'm removing it again.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 18:42, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it - it's well referenced, IMHO, and Wikipedia is not censored just because unnamed or new editors think it "must go!" TheRealFennShysa (talk) 20:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Wikipedia articles on characters should reflect analysis from outside parties and creation and conception articles. So far the "sexuality" section is the only reliably sourced section that does not rely on the TV show itself.
2. The opinions and viewpoints originate from a peer reviewed journal article. Wikipedia needs to address that, especially in absence of any other analysis of the character.
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:46, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is this any kind of reliable source? It's basically a blog, nothing more.Judgeking (talk) 07:01, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Like an editor above said, this is a non-issue. JP Dennis is a gay writer who writes about gay issues, of course he sees gay couples everywhere! There are no "facts" here, only opinions of one man; this is heavily POV, undue weight, original research and unreliable source. Anyone can put a 'paper' up on the web, that doesn't make it a reliable reference. Judgeking (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a section about this one reference on the Reliable Sources noticeboard at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Cartoon_Sexuality, any interested parties may want to participate. Judgeking (talk) 21:44, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the issue of potential homosexuality should not be readded. It places undue weight on a topic that I believe is a non-issue for most people. Also, the paper the section references contains the opinion of only one man, who, as a gay man himself who writes almost exclusively about gay issues, cannot be objective. Judgeking (talk) 18:12, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above reply was cross-posted to many articles, without consideration to the article's contents and the particular proposed Dennis revisions. Considering the decision at the RS noticeboard here, a Wikipedian cannot make a blanket statements that a particular source is undue for all articles. It must be determined on an article by article basis. WhisperToMe (talk) 21:27, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My reply is the same in each article, because the section was almost the same in each article. They all basically go "Dennis thinks this character may be gay. Martin Goodman of Animation World Magazine responded 'That's interesting'". Ridiculous we're even having this debate. Judgeking (talk) 22:13, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1."because the section was almost the same in each article" - That is not correct. And plus that response fails to consider that the articles themselves differ a lot. Undue weight is a consideration of the proposed revision and the existing article.

2."They all basically go "Dennis thinks this character may be gay." - The Scooby Doo and Daria stuff don't say that at all. And with other characters there are explanations and qualifications added. The lengths of the latter do differ, with the original Pinky and the Brain revision taking far more space than the Heffer revision, for instance. The amount of space devoted to a subject or an idea within an article is a consideration for whether something is of undue weight.

3."Martin Goodman of Animation World Magazine responded 'That's interesting'"" - To two (Spongebob and Pinky) - He challenged the analysis of some other characters. And even "that's interesting" adds weight to warranting inclusion of the Dennis stuff.

WhisperToMe (talk) 22:18, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For articles when they already mention things about their sexuality yes it should be added, but articles like this one where Dennis is alone it should not be added. JDDJS (talk) 21:30, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, just because other articles about Shaggy don't talk about his sexuality doesn't necessarily mean that including one or two sentences from Dennis would be making everything undue weight. It depends on how much of the other research is included and how many sentences are about Dennis's theories.

The main problem with this article is that it's all plot summary and has no analysis. One can argue "including Dennis in this case would be Undue because it's the only analysis in the article" BUT it also means this article is in danger of being merged into a general "Characters of Scooby Doo" article. Some people want an article just about Shaggy. In this case they need to do the research to pull up what journalists and researchers say about Shaggy. Then we can have a better grasp of whether Dennis's statement is undue for that particular character.

WhisperToMe (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the problems with Dennis's article: 1. He is clearly biased on account he himself is gay and 2. He only briefly talks about Shaggy and 3. I don't really think the point of the article was to call cartoon characters gay. I think it was more just trying to show the perception of gay cartoon characters. JDDJS (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After rereading the article Dennis does not seem to really think that Shaggy is gay. JDDJS (talk) 00:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. Dennis said that other people think Shaggy and Scooby are gay, based on the SMF article. Goodman responded by saying that Dennis had misread the SMF source. WhisperToMe (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Cartoon_Sexuality WhisperToMe (talk) 02:45, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also WP:FRINGE says "We use the term fringe theory in a very broad sense to describe ideas that depart significantly from the prevailing or mainstream view in its particular field."

Dennis said in his essay that Scooby and Shaggy are not gay. If the mainstream viewpoint is that Scooby and Shaggy are not gay, then Dennis's conclusion is not a fringe theory.

WhisperToMe (talk) 20:26, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy is a vegetarian and collects beltbuckels

Why dudes and dudettes lol, I was watching boomerang and I saw a follow-up story on Shaggy which shows he's skinny even though he eats a lot because he's vegetarian, but he ate a lot of scooby snacks which made him fat so he decied to distract himself out of eating by collecting Belt buckels (sorry if i spelled it wrong I'm not really sure if you spell it like that). And now has like more than 300 Belt buckels, and he always wears a different one in each episode.(talk) 19:24, 1 March 2009 (UTC

Shaggy is not vegetarian. He is seen eating meat in many different canonical iterations of the series, including the newer feature-length movies. For example, in Scooby-Doo and the Witch's Ghost he is seen eating pot roast, ham and other meats. I don't know what "Boomerang" is, but Shaggy is a carnivore through-and-through. Supertheman ^(talk) 05:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy turned vegan/vegetarian when Casey Kasem, his voice actor, changed his dietary habit, but when other actors voice him, like Scott Innes or more recently Matthew Lillard, he becomes carnivore once more, simple as. 92.6.87.145 (talk) 01:42, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the latest movie he is seen eating meat, and Casey is voicing him no more. So, Shaggy is a carnivore forevermore. In all the new movies (starting with Zombie Island), he is seen eating meat and or seafood. I'm not sure what episodes he was a vegan, but he was never a vegan in these movies and they were voiced by Kasem.Supertheman ^(talk) 20:34, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy GIF

File:Shaggy Rogers.gif

I found this new Shaggy GIF and I thought it would be good for this article since it features Shaggy in his classic form and shows not just his front but his whole body. So I thought it would be nice to add so people can see what he looks all around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by J.Severe (talk • contribs) 16:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy the Stoner

This page talks about the fact of Shaggy embodying the Beatnik/Hippy characteristics, but the one encompassing stereotype that he embodies is that of the stoner.

He is one of the best examples of the stoner archetype in cartoon form.

He seems to have an omnipresent case of the munchies

Gets freaked out by things a lot

Is a slacker and is unmotivated

appears to have poor hygiene —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.190.171 (talk) 04:16, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

His girlfriend is also named Mary Jane in the movie and he remarks "thats like my favorite name"--67.86.120.246 (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dresses weird, with no socks on — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.226.211.33 (talk) 17:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Many people are slackers, have bottomless stomachs, are easily frightened, and/or have poor hygiene w/o the help of being a pot head. Considering rumors are not substantiated by official releases from the creators of the show, this continues to be simply an area of OR/fancruft. Ckruschke (talk) 19:04, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Ckruschke[reply]

Shaggy's real first name

Several official credits in the IMDb list Shaggy's full name as Norville 'Shaggy' Rogers. This constitutes alignment with canon. The entry should reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.205.46.210 (talk) 18:03, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In Scooby-Doo and the Alien Invaders, he says "Norville" too, and then says "people call me Shaggy". 24.199.69.143 (talk) 07:19, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the canonical show "A Pup Named Scooby Doo", season one, episode six entitled "The Babysitter From Beyond" his parents call him "Norville" quite clearly. Shaggy doesn't like being called "Norville" because (as he says) "It's like, not cool", but his name is "Norville" and it is canonical. End of argument.Supertheman ^(talk) 05:00, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shah-Gee

What's this "Shah-Gee" stuff, eh?82.136.244.55 (talk) 13:58, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uncle Shagworthy?

I wonder how long this has been sitting here with no one noticing it.

"Uncle Shagworthy: Shaggy's rich uncle. Not only does he look like his nephew — he has the same appetite and cowardice. He keeps his most precious possession (marijuana) in a secret refrigerator with valuable jewels." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.49.108.114 (talk) 17:17, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit request

{{editprotected}} Remove the sexuality statement. Relies mostly on the writings of Jeffrey P. Dennis who is likely connected to editor who added it. Editor was told not to add it but several users but didn't listen. JDDJS (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a section about this one reference on the Reliable Sources noticeboard at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#Cartoon_Sexuality, any interested parties may want to participate. Judgeking (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus seems to be that this section places undue weight on a subject that is a non-issue in the cartoon itself. I'll remove it again once the protection has expired. Judgeking (talk) 00:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Protection is off, so there no need for admin editing. Play nice.--SPhilbrick T 01:37, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The consensus at RS noticeboard is that A. the source is an RS and B. the RS noticeboard is not the place for determining whether something is of undue weight.

Undue weight is an editorial concern, and that is resolved on an article by article basis on the talk page(s).

In this case, there's hardly anything scholarly so far presented about Shaggy. Fictional character articles are supposed to contain "creation and conception" (from primary sources) and "reception/analysis" (from secondary sources) - So far, Dennis had the only secondary source content.

What this article needs is for more info from secondary sources to be posted here

WhisperToMe (talk) 18:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Fringe_theories/Noticeboard#Cartoon_Sexuality WhisperToMe (talk) 02:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy/Daphne?

Does anyone know what Shaggy and Daphne's relationship was during the 80's when they were the only remaining human members from the original Mystery Inc.? Ztyran (talk) 06:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

They were dating in the 80's, but forget adding it to this wiki, people keep deleting it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tete48888888 (talk • contribs) 11:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Zoinks!

Wha, no mention of his catch phrase? As you can see, it's even a redirect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.254.84.155 (talk) 15:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shaggy marijuana use rumors are not OR, not fancruft

It is come to my attention that a Wikipedia user removed the info on the Shaggy marijuana use rumors saying it was OR and fancruft. I want to remind the editors here that this isn't the case.

Wikipedia:OR means "material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist."
Fancruft is not fancruft if it is documented in published, reliable sources.

WhisperToMe (talk) 02:56, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hardly. The section in question was a para with several refs the consisted "only" of people commenting on the rumors/fancruft about Shaggy being a pothead or their opinions of such. This is NOT published, reliable sources - it is the definition of fancruft and commenting on fancruft. All "official" sources - i.e. people associated with the show (including Casey Kasem) roundly poo-poo the notion. The rest of the section was unsubstantiated OR. Not sure what you are looking at but it was all nonsense and/or wishful thinking... Ckruschke (talk) 18:45, 18 March 2014 (UTC)Ckruschke[reply]

Missing voice actor

There seem to be no mention Duncan Robertson's portrayal of the character in the Peter Pan Records series. 108.57.83.26 (talk) 10:06, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of it. If you have info to add, please feel free to WP:BEBOLD and insert that. Ckruschke (talk) 18:47, 7 April 2014 (UTC)Ckruschke[reply]

Dapper Jack Rogers

you forgot Shaggy's Great great grandfather Shaggeena (talk) 09:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coward?

At the risk of taking things too seriously, I always object to the characterization of Shaggy and Scooby as "cowardly". They often have the most face-to-face interaction with the villains, don costumes and stage elaborate "skits" to distract them, etc. Like Klinger in M*A*S*H, they don't seek out danger, but they do what they need to do, and their friends can count on them. PurpleChez (talk) 17:11, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clone Wars

Would it be appropriate to mention the character, Padawan Sha'a Gi, from Star Wars: Clone Wars (2003 TV series), which was created, at least visually, in homage to Shaggy Rogers? PurpleChez (talk) 13:25, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Original: Norville "Shaggy" Rogers is a fictional character in the Scooby-Doo franchise. He is a cowardly slacker and the long-time best friend of his equally cowardly Great Dane, Scooby-Doo. Like Scooby-Doo, Shaggy is more interested in eating than solving mysteries.

My changed version Norville "Shaggy" Rogers is a god in the Scooby-Doo franchise. He is a cowardly slacker and the long-time best friend of his equally cowardly Great Dane, Scooby-Doo. Like Scooby-Doo, Shaggy is more interested in eating than solving mysteries. He also has superpowers that let him do anything without even using that much of his power capacity. Boi nogga (talk) 05:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 31 January 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

can you add in the fact that Shaggy is God Very Reliable News Source101 (talk) 13:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No that would be vandalism if you use Wikipedia like a meme. You’re referring to the popular meme which might work out in a popular culture section given if there is enough valid sources for it. But we must treat Wikipedia as fact based. Try Uncyclopedia if you want a meme or parody based Wiki. Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 19:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 14 January 2020

Since apparently Ultra Instinct Shaggy warranted a sub-section, is it permissible to add that the video which spawned the meme was taken down at the beginning of the year out of fear it would be flagged by YouTube's COPPA thing? 74.90.120.94 (talk) 02:58, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional mentions in the internet meme section

Probably worth mentioning that DC Comics referenced the Internet meme, as well as the official twitter for the Scoob! movie. --84.203.3.164 (talk) 22:45, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 11 April 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The voice actors section of the info of Scott Innes needs to be updated, as shown here "Scott Innes (1999–2009, 2010–2018, 2020)". The reason being is that even though he stopped voicing him in 2009, he actually continued to voice him in several McDonald's commercials and in the Scooby-Doo! The Museum of Mysteries theme park ride from 2010 to 2018. He also recently returned to voice Shaggy in the Playmobil shorts on YouTube in 2020. As shown bellow.

Shown here:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PRzIl7hxUMQ, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHXKAhv-J_0, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDe9ssF6gcE, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=atWGEh80Xng 2600:1000:B06F:1B9E:A103:BB09:10F1:3FAD (talk) 04:00, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The YouTube videos are cute, but they do not list the voice actors. GoingBatty (talk) 21:31, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 9 November 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I realized there is some incorrect info on Shaggy's significant others. BigAbbey (talk) 20:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Could you be more specific, and point to reliable sources if possible? – Thjarkur (talk) 20:15, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 February 2021

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I want to request an edit because I saw 5 grammer mistakes and i would like to add some information 82.15.52.160 (talk) 14:30, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: That's not how this works. Please tell us what problems need to be fixed and someone will fix them for you. Thanks. Bowling is life (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please list the grammar mistakes you'd like to fix, and provide the information you'd like to add with sources. Thanks! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 14:36, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 21 December 2021

File:Download,jpeg

Downloads

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

67.53.94.94 (talk) 18:52, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 19:03, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 19 May 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I'd like to insert a link to Legend of the Phantosaur where the title is listed. Rio Carvalho (talk) 00:13, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done AnnaMankad (talk) 02:09, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 July 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Scott Innes still voices Shaggy. 2601:14F:80:E070:C8CD:86D8:73DC:DBBA (talk) 02:36, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Heart ^(talk) 02:40, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Scott Innes still does the voice of Shaggy for commercials and video games. 2601:14F:80:E070:85FA:6D60:F386:E6C (talk) 04:45, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 08:05, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Scott Innes still does Shaggy’s voice.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Wsx8XXL2cKY&pp=ygUVc2NvdHQgaW5uZXMgaW50ZXJ2aWV3 2601:14F:80:E070:85FA:6D60:F386:E6C (talk) 04:50, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hello everybody my name is Markiplier 2601:40C:C200:8950:F92C:6C7D:C0B5:2C14 (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi 2A02:C7C:E2BC:FA00:15D8:4AC2:2394:F4B6 (talk) 16:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello everybody and my name is Markiplier welcome, back to another video welcome 2601:40C:C200:8950:F92C:6C7D:C0B5:2C14 (talk) 06:10, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 2 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I just want to put shaggy's age in if that is okay 28sevygriffink (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Jamedeus (talk) 01:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 5 August 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I just want to put his age in the article 28sevygriffink (talk) 01:20, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:30, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Only protagonist with facial hair

It says Shaggy is the only one, but Surely Scooby Doo himself has facial hair too. Could we add an "(except Scooby)" to that sentence in the article? 84.217.210.209 (talk) 07:40, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]