Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The West Coast Surrealist Group
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was deleted by Quadell as a copyright violation. Closing the discussion.
More Surrealismcruft, 94 google hits. -- Infrogmation 19:11, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems like a notable, widely documented group to me.--Gene_poole 23:43, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Infrogmation, I was thinking about deleting this group, yet there is wide documetation on their work as Genepool mentions above. Their history, art and work are all documented in museums, galleries, and there was a TV Documentary on the Bravo Channel in Canada on their founding member Gregg Simpson that featured West Coast Surrealist Group's history as well as his work in surrealism. Plus, there is proof of their existence and work on the site that showcases their history. Though the 94 hits is really, really small and minor, I must vote to keep, though the very little hits would have me delete, I will vote to keep knowing that credible research results exist proving notability, especially among art scholars and museums.Classicjupiter2 00:51, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete... article opens with, The West Coast of North America, where there is a natural surreality in the landscape... er, ok... but article offers no evidence of encyclopedic content, wide review... smells like a stealth ad to me. Wyss 01:07, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Agree with Wyss, change my vote to *delete. Or someone needs to re-write the article.01:30, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)Classicjupiter2 01:36, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, not encyclopaedic, advertisement. Megan1967 02:55, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, somehow I feel this connected to the Portland Surrealist Group that was VfD only a few days ago.. hmm...Tygar 04:21, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete seems vanity. Radiant! 08:59, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyvio of page http://www.greggsimpson.com/Chronowelcome.htm . -Hapsiainen 17:41, Mar 9, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, nn vanicruft. ComCat 02:30, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
- Comment Now listed as copyvio. For the content under discussion see the History.
- Delete, non-notable, vanity, advertising.Dpbsmith (talk) 22:26, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.