Talk:Paul Watzlawick

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Systems Mid‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is not associated with a particular field. Fields are listed on the template page.

Psychology

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Psychologist?

How can one become a psychologist if one never studied it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.34.83.114 (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He was by the Jung Institute in ZurichDeletingMe (talk) 21:28, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Radical constructivism?

I hope that Constructivist epistemology#Radical constructivism is the right link... Though I wonder if this link could instead point to Social constructivism. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:49, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

For me the good link should be "Constructivism" or "Constructivist epistemology" without "radical" because PW's book "Invented reality ..." has for subtitle "Contribution to Constructivism" and this term is not needed. But the current article "Constructivist epistemology" is really incomplete... Chrisdel 06:53, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 00:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An image on this page may be deleted

This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:1phpwatzlawick.jpg, found on Paul Watzlawick, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 17:55, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to downplay his therapeutic work

There's just a mention of his work at the Brief Therapy Center. Reading the critique section regarding his first book, one might get the impression his overall work was not practical, which I think would be very off-base. He was influential to the formation of Brief Therapy and later variations like Solution-Focused therapy. There's also documented success in his therapeutic approach, if someone wants to go digging for it. DeletingMe (talk) 21:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Paul Watzlawick. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:17, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interpunktion

Hi, I'd like to suggest the term "parsing" instead of "punctuation" as a translation. MVH, T 84.208.65.62 (talk) 15:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]