User talk:Nate~enwiki

Please stop posting nonsense to the Wikipedia. It is also considered bad form to log in with two different accounts. RickK 03:06, 19 Feb 2004 (UTC)

tfd

TfD nomination of Template:User gop

Template:User gop has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:User gop. Thank you. xaosflux ^Talk/_CVU 06:23, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Relevance

Nate,

Regarding your reverting changes on Open Shortest Path First. Let me just state once again, for the record, that:

the license of an implementation is not at all relevant to the OSPF protocol page.
OpenBSD's openbgpd does NOT have an OSPF implementation built in.

It's therefore obvious that such additions are not relevant to the OSPF page, and that this amounts to spreading the OpenBSD gospel. I understand that you feel strongly about OpenBSD, as does User:Janizary, and as do probably lots more people he can ask for help on this. But that doesn't change the fact that you're wrong, and that the OSPF article is the wrong place to be spreading the word on OpenBSD. Biot 08:54, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

His point about CVS was what beat you, it's right there to download whenever you want it. Beyond that, the license used is something that people may care about, hell, listing the platforms it works on would be relevant as well. I don't contribute much, I mostly dink around, but I do occasionally see things that even I think are stupid - your insistance on not listing licenses is one of those, this information is not only relevant but useful. Just look at the SSH article, it's got a big list that even lists the programming language that is used in some cases, the license and even the the platform it runs on. Nate 18:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use violation

The image you reinserted into Template:User debian, Image:Openlogo-nd-100.png is marked as being used under fair use. It cannot be used in user or templace space according to wikipedia policies (see WP:FUC. Admins have been instructed to enforce this policy, with blocking if neccessary. Do not reinsert it or you may be blocked. Further, do not address me, or any other user, as 'dumbass' or you may well be blocked for personal attacks (see also WP:CIVIL). --Doc ^ask? 22:17, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nate, you've been blocked for 12 hours for personal attacks. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 23:07, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I missed the wording underneath the tag, thanks for bringing it to my attention. Sorry for the mistake, I'm only human. However, personal attacks are not excusable. I warned you once, and you ontinued - the block above is well justified. --Doc ^ask? 23:10, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

template:user fsm

I'm calling out a posse, to fight for freedom of choice, to fight all those who think that only their opinion's right, template:user fsm was speedy deleted by an administrator without any cause or even discussion, I'm therefore putting it up for undeletion since people have put a jihad out against opinions in userboxes. As you were one of many people using the template, I'm trying to rally you into the posse. If you think the template should be returned to active status, put in a vote at Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Userbox_debates#template:user_fsm. Janizary 04:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Nate. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Nate~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

02:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

16:49, 22 April 2015 (UTC)