Talk:Lithium, Missouri

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

It is requested that an image or photograph of Lithium, Missouri be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Missouri may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

How is it possible for this "place" to have 0 people and 0 km2 area???

I've heard this can happen when a location becomes strictly a commercial site where no one lives. It can also happen because of a Census mistake. Perhaps the Census Bureau has discretion if it anticipates a place may repopulate. The zero area leads me to believe it may be a mistake. Catbar (Brian Rock) 23:43, 15 Oct 2004 (UTC)

i know this town and it is true there is no mistake. it is small and run down and I don't think anyone lives in town because you could kick a stone from one end of town to the other. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.43.141.203 (talk) 01:48, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I visited this village 12 March 2024 and there was a town park with playground equipment and a recently dated shelter. This was surrounded by occupied houses and a group of 8 house trailers. Farmed fields with occupied farm houses were seen up to the edges of the former village center. I could not accurately assess the population. Juhlemann (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithium, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/64vfLAeJ2?url=http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt to http://www.census.gov/geo/www/gazetteer/files/Gaz_places_national.txt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:57, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lithium, Missouri. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20070310122435/http://64.146.17.242/stories/032801/sta_0328010020.asp to http://64.146.17.242/stories/032801/sta_0328010020.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]