Talk:Electoral reform
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Electoral reform article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 1095 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Electoral Reform Act of 2015
[edit]Consider looking into this. It started as findings from Occupy working group on electoral reform in 2011, morphed into an 11 point proposal based on information harvested from a wide number of stakeholders as shown at http://bigbatusa.org, and recently has been in a book that made #1 at Amazon in Civics Kindle, briefly, Open Power: Electoral Reform Act of 2015 - Open Source Activist Tool-Kit. The home page tiny url /OpenPower has been blocked for reasons beyond my comprehension, further confirming my view that Wikipedia suffers from too many abusers.
Robert Steele 68.98.139.15 (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
- Can you give some reliable source coverage of the campaign/proposals? Bondegezou (talk) 21:51, 5 July 2015 (UTC)
Electoral reform in Canada
[edit]A page on electoral reform in Canada now exists. Is this the right name or should it be "Canadian electoral reform", "U.S. electoral reform", etc.? Please pick one!
- Electoral reform in New Zealand is in the same format. --LeftyG 09:08, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure who wrote the section on electoral reform in Canada, but it was riddled with factual inaccuracies and a few spelling errors to boot. 1. The Liberals did not promise to implement Instant Runoff Voting, they promised to investigate numerous electoral reform options (including IRV and proportional systems) 2. The author's claim that the all-party committee will not arrive at consensus, describing moves towards Instant Runoff Voting at the municipal level as "more hopeful," and the comparison between Fair Vote Canada (a well known electoral reform NGO) and "CoVote" (whatever that is) indicate clear and unacceptable bias.
I too have a bias in this debate (towards proportional representation), but Wikipedia articles should never be skewed so blatantly. As such, I rewrote the entire section and unlike the last author provided sources. Chris-Gilmore77 (talk) 10:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Electoral reform. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090211235108/http://www.electionreformproject.org/ to http://www.electionreformproject.org/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:50, 19 September 2017 (UTC)