This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Cleveland, the scope of which includes Cleveland and the Greater Cleveland Area. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.ClevelandWikipedia:WikiProject ClevelandTemplate:WikiProject ClevelandCleveland articles
That is not necessarily evidence of wrong-doing. It is somewhat surprising given the amount of information added to the article in the past few years. Also, it is odd, given that this guy is the focus of a lot of attention recently including plenty of additions to his BLP. Has an archive been lost or misplaced, I wonder?--FeralOink (talk) 00:11, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There's no indication of a lost archive. Talk pages are to discuss the article, not the topic. Editors generally agreeing (or not bothered enough to vocally disagree) about edits is common enough on Wikipedia. Weazie (talk) 19:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In its current draft, this article is blatantly biased against Mr. Corsi. From the opening paragraph, you get a sense that the editors of the article have a negative point of view of his contributions. And it continues throughout the rest of the text. It's one-sided. The article should have a neutral-sounding opening paragraph highlighting his accomplishments. For example, "Jerome Corsi is a best-selling American author and holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University." Save phrases like, "attacked Democratic presidential candidates" for later in the article. But then it needs to be balanced with supporting comments in favor of Mr. Corsi's work.
To quote the Wikipedia article template, "An unbalanced article is one that does not fairly represent the balance of perspectives of high-quality, reliable secondary sources." In addition, "The personal views of Wikipedia editors or the public are irrelevant." This article needs editors from both sides of the table.
MusicTree3 (talk) 05:34, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The very first sentence notes two of Corsi's books were best sellers. Regardless, if you know of "high-quality, reliable secondary sources" that provide an alternative view, please feel free to include them in an edit. Weazie (talk) 20:38, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
