Talk:Journalism ethics and standards

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Philosophy: Ethics Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics

Archives

Archive 1

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 31 August 2021 and 7 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Basketballfan301. Peer reviewers: Phil the Human.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:29, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2020 and 18 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Taylorbruce23.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Journalism ethics and standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050304034708/http://archives.thedaily.washington.edu:80/1995/120495/wped.html to http://archives.thedaily.washington.edu/1995/120495/wped.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:49, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Journalism ethics and standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060615025620/http://www.uta.fi/ethicnet/ to http://www.uta.fi/ethicnet/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:59, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lede section

In the future, if you don't wish to have vandalism that completely removes numerous editors' contributions and an enormous section of an article persisting for over 70 days, please check the goddamn article history. 9³ 03:15, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Journalism ethics and standards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:42, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

AD55sarajevo1MG 9090-033.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:40, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Basic Grammar

This article is very ironically written and obviously not by a bona fide journalist. Its basic syntax is often jumbled, it makes poor use of punctuation, and is shabbily structured. Someone with better qualifications than mine should do a heavy edit. 73.116.98.214 (talk) 18:35, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@73.116.98.214 d'accord. 67.149.71.156 (talk) 02:49, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm shocked that this has not been addressed. At one point the article references the "Acton Plan" (with no link), and at another point it references the "Action Plan" (also with no link). The plan, whatever it is actually called, seems important to the premise of the article.

There are also sentences that lack proper grammatical structure: "The Action Plan, proposed, the EU authorities, is meant to propose a guide for identifying misinformation."

I came to the article looking for information to back up an argument for seeking credible sources, and instead found content that is not credible. Mystreba (talk) 23:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality dispute

@EmperorÖsmanIXXVMD: Why is this section's neutrality now being disputed? Jarble (talk) 18:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hedge fund journalism?

Does this deserve mention on this page? https://www.ft.com/content/38bc7834-10fe-4510-956b-272daf99ad3b Sawitontwitter (talk) 01:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NOTNEWS would seem to apply for this specific instance, but the overall influence of finance on journalism ethics could certainly be discussed. Sdkb ^talk 06:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Complete BS

Journalism ethics and standards?! Hahahaha! 🤣 🤣😂😂

Shouldn't this article be renamed "So-called journalism ethics and standards"? What a joke! 2401:7000:CADC:7000:B4AD:1548:8EE0:5038 (talk) 03:34, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]