Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Brock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:36, 14 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Notability, "best known"?, a delete? Feydey 22:11, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. "Hey," I thought when I saw this up, "is this the Brock: On the Attack Mike Brock?" I'd vouch for the claim he is among the best known; my professional journalist/blogger friend has asked me 'have you seen what Brock: On The Attack is saying about this or that' at least once. Samaritan 22:53, 4 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep notable bloggers; I'll trust Samaritan on this one .Meelar (talk) 01:00, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity. --Spinboy 03:57, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Mike H 09:42, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity. Megan1967 10:27, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I can easily say that Mike Brock is one of the "best known" bloggers. Among the political and media community, he's very much considered a must read. --24.141.149.194 14:08, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Above User:24.141.149.194's first and so far only contributions are to this VfD page, so despite my own position that vote shouldn't stand. Samaritan 18:16, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Samaritan's reasoning. Heck, he's host of a major-market radio talk show as well. - Lucky 6.9 19:02, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Not the host, but a regular guest on Mark Elliot's show (the main one, not the addiction one...) Samaritan 20:34, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep please people will look for this here Yuckfoo 23:25, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Samaritan's assessment. Kappa 23:33, 5 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep. significant. Kingturtle 06:26, 7 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems notable to me, assuming the article is accurate, and this seems to be unchallenged. Andrewa 16:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.