Talk:Newbury (UK Parliament constituency)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

UK Parliament constituencies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Parliament constituencies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Parliament constituencies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK Parliament constituenciesWikipedia:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesTemplate:WikiProject UK Parliament constituenciesUK Parliament constituencies articles

Politics of the United Kingdom Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Previous MPs

I can't find anywhere which says which party some of the previous MPs come from. Stranger is a Liberal according to election.demon.co.uk and therefore I've worked out that Howard Clifton Brown must reasonably be a Conservative. William Arthur Mount is listed on the Chiltern Hundreds so he definately resigned, he is probably a conservative.

Cinema

If needed, I have a scan of the flyer the Conservatives posted just before the elction regarding the Newbury cinema. 84.64.141.210 20:52, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fox-hunting and so on

That bit about fox-hunting is rubbish and should be taken out. The Tories won because they won over more people on council estates in the constituency, where the average voter is largely unconcerned with hunting. I was there throughout the early part of 2005 and have studied the constituency in depth and the change in support is too large to be accounted for solely by hunting. It is a cop-out on Rendel's behalf because the most significant factor in Rendel's defeat was the fact that he had neglected the constituency for years and national issues played a large part in getting out the vote on the day. Lstanley1979 (talk) 12:27, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken out the whole of the paragraphs on 2005. Most of it is untrue or misleading (the LibDems wanted to turn the whole of the marketplace into an Italian piazza, not just use imported marble) and is written from a POV which I can only describe as biased. Most wikis on constituencies in the UK do not have any preamble to the results and let them stand alone as their own witness. Anyone involved in electoral politics in the UK is going to take sides on issues and skew them in their own favour so I don't believe it is necessary to detail the campaign as if one was writing an article for your local party newsletter. Sorry but better no commentary than an obviously biased one. Lstanley1979 (talk) 12:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Newbury (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120717034847/http://www.northwessexdowns.org.uk/wba/nwd-aonb/NWDWebsiteV3.nsf/$LUcontent/2.4?OpenDocument to http://www.northwessexdowns.org.uk/wba/nwd-aonb/NWDWebsiteV3.nsf/$LUcontent/2.4?OpenDocument

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Newbury (UK Parliament constituency). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:20, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]