Talk:Seawolf-class submarine

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Seawolf-class submarine article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Military history: Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

S6W reactor power output

According to the MIT article previously cited [1], the reactor has a thermal output of 220MW and a shaft power output of 57000shp. However, an article from Global Security [2] states that the S6W has a thermal output of 270MW and a shaft power output of 52000shp. Currently, I’ve continued to use the figures from the MIT article while adding the Global Security article’s information on the steam turbines. Nevertheless, I would like some input on how to reconcile these two conflicting sources. Thanks! (note that the propulsion information is on a separate template Template:Seawolf-class submarine propulsion, which is where I made my edits and future edits should be made. This split was made in 2021 by another editor) Liu1126 (talk) 12:39, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should probably go with just the MIT source, (and/or a new source), as Global Security has been, or is in the process of being, deprecated as an unreliable source. - wolf 03:36, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. I wasn’t aware of the RFC before, but in this case, it would probably be wise to go with the MIT source for now. Thanks! Liu1126 (talk) 06:07, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

so what happened to ge's IPMP2 prototype all in one design unit that was being developed as a pumpjet 2601:603:600:1030:9109:643B:A11F:73DB (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]