Jump to content

Talk:Rail transport

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateRail transport is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 9, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Rail transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:18, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rail transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

|PSP SA=yes

[edit]

I removed |PSP SA=yes which has nothing to do with rail transport, but should any country be mentioned here at all?--Dthomsen8 (talk) 16:30, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Hund"

[edit]

"The miners called the wagons Hunde ("dogs") from the noise they made on the tracks.[10]" - more or less nonsense. First, the common name for a mining cart is "Hunt" with T. Second, the connection with dogs only comes from Agricola which is doubted. Third, several alternative and more convincing explanations are given including old measures an a Slovacian word meaning waggon. See also German entry at de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunt — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.71.27.233 (talk) 08:03, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What's the source book for this? Lewis' Early wooden railways? It's pretty rare and expensive – I don't have one – but that covers "hunde" fairly well. They were even called that in South Wales. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Train avatar added to article

[edit]

I put a train avatar on the page in hopes it will be the hover image of Rail transport links. Have there been any discussions of WikiProject:Trains primary topic and flagship articles? Greetings Paptilian (talk) 17:31, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I've removed it.
  • It's weird. Literally. We don't have these on other pages, so having one here, all on its own, is unusual, unexpected and confusing.
  • It's not even linked to anything. Just what is an "avatar" for?
  • Aren't we winding back all the WP:PORTALS stuff anyway?
If there was a trains portal, we might use something like this. But we already have one, it goes somewhere when you click it, and we (broadly) seem to be reducing these rather than expanding them. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Andy, I agree, and so you know i want to help in the category dept for the WikiProject Trains, is anyone interested in helping me be conducive with the project? Paptilian (talk) 15:46, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files enlarged but footers still don't show

[edit]

Where are the footers? Peter Horn User talk 13:52, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Peter Horn: It's nothing to do with the image sizes (which are somewhat excessive). One of the four spaces between | footer and the next equals sign isn't a space, it's a non-breaking space. So effectively you have |footer   = Left: Railway turnouts; Right: ... and that is not a recognised parameter name. Retype that parameter using only normal spaces around the parameter name, and it will work. On an unrelated matter, for |footer_align=, left/right/center is not a valid value, it should be one of those three words, or blank. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:44, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In addition,hoedoes one reduce the size of the images is this format? Peter Horn User talk 00:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Peter Horn: Set different values for |width1= and |width2=. But all this is documented at Template:Multiple image. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Peter Horn User talk 21:03, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Yellowstone Park Railroad" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Yellowstone Park Railroad. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 24#Yellowstone Park Railroad until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Ost (talk) 16:52, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

trains

[edit]

why are we talking about trains? Haleymiranda1979 (talk) 10:15, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also bloat

[edit]

User:Helper201 is engaged in a campaign to oppose any trimming of the bloated see also section. WP:SEEALSO says "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body." Helper201 ignores this. See also sections are not a dumping ground for any remotely related link. See also sections are not even required to be in articles at all. By flooding them with links already discussed in the body, their usefulness is decreased. From an article as broad as rail transport, we absolutely should not be linking niche topics. The see also links should be broader concepts that are in some way related to this topic but not linked in the article at present. It is difficult to try and perform article cleanup when people refuse to allow any changes. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 21:50, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, agree to that. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:47, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Trainsandotherthings my apologies, I didn't see these were already linked in the main text. However, TGV isn't, so I'll re-add that one only. Helper201 (talk) 10:43, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Rail_transport&oldid=1253779340"