User talk:Jorgengb

Here are some tips to help you get started:

If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
Read the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!
Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use ~~~~ (4 tildes).

Toglimi una curiosità, ma tu hai vissuto in Italia e/o hai parenti italiani, o ti sei imparato l'italiano e il lombardo per semplice interesse personale? Io al contrario (paradossalmente?) è da poco che mi interesso delle lingue romanze, fino a un annetto fa mi interessavano soprattutto le lingue germaniche, e infatti mi sono "imparato" (moooolto tra virgolette) lo svedese... Non so poi se il fatto che siano state fatte relativamente poche correzioni al mio articolo "Milanesiska" su sv.wiki debba rendermi fiero del mio svedese o semplicemente farmi pensare che nessuno avesse voglia di riscriverlo da capo ;-)

In quanto alle lingue romanze, invece... posso avere una tua opinione sull'evoluzione dal latino? Tutti dicono che le lingue romanze derivano dal latino volgare e non dal latino classico, e questo mi pare ovvio. Ma cosa è veramente questo latino volgare? Per esempio, secondo te nel latino parlato quando ancora c'era l'Impero si usava "ille" come articolo?

Secondo me sì: com'è possibile altrimenti che in tutte le lingue romanze (salvo, che io sappia, il rumeno e il sardo, che sono comunque lingue piuttosto marginali [nel senso di "marginal"]) si sia scelto "ille" come articolo?

In questo momento mi viene in mente solo la questione dell'articolo, ma ho pensato spesso che ci sono varie "coincidenze" strane tra le varie lingue romanze, che non riuscirei a spiegare se non con il fatto che il latino del tardo Impero dovesse già essere molto vicino alle lingue romanze di oggi.

Ovviamente puoi rispondermi in italiano in inglese, come preferisci... magari non in norvegese - anche se sarebbe un bell'esercizio, ma poi probabilmente dovrei chiederti di ritradurre tutto in inglese o in italiano ;-)

I can't give you a complete answer about CPU speed, since modern CPUs really have a lot of factors influencing speed, whose names, acronyms and meanings I prefer to remain ignorant about.

But, as a general picture, there is the CPU, which goes at a speed; there is the system bus (the PCI bus on most computers), which goes at a(nother) speed; and there is the memory bus, which goes (guess what) at another speed.

In the so called "old days", one clock really gave the computer speed: the CPU, memory, and often the "peripherals" (i.e. anything else) worked synchronously. Today, this model has become inefficient, and so the components have been uncoupled (the CPU works at a speed; the system bus and the memory bus work at two different speed, since memory transfers usually needs to be a lot faster).

Then there is something called "multipliers", which is simply circuits that multiply or divide a clock signal: 166 Mhz with an 8x multiplier is a complex way of saying 1328 Mhz (sometimes, though, two components work with the same clock but different multipliers, so it can be useful to know about the "base" clock speed).

With today's PCs, you'll hear the terms "clock speed", "FSB [Front Side Bus] speed" and "bus speed" (PCI / AGP / misc). I'm not 100% sure I'm telling you the right things, but "clock speed" is the CPU speed (base clock * multiplier), "FSB speed" is the memory bus speed (the base clock with no multiplier, if I recall correctly), and bus speed is bus speed, i.e. 66MHz for the PCI bus.

Look at the FSB article, at a quick glance it seems to give decent information. Also clock speed, which doesn't seem to be very detailed though.

Frieda ha modificato l'articolo sul milanese sulla Wikipedia italiana, eliminando ancora una volta i termini "lingua" e "varietà" per sostituirli con "dialetto". Ho scritto un paio di righe al riguardo sulla talkpage dell'articolo. Se ci vuoi dare un'occhiata... a me pare proprio che il modo in cui viene gestita la questione su it.wiki non abbia il minimo senso.

LjL 15:24, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

RfA for Kemmótar

The RfA you made for Kemmótar has not been properly formatted or accepted by the nominee. Please follow Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate carefully. I have removed the RfA from WP:RFA. --Durin 18:20, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA for Kemmótar

The RfA you made for Kemmótar has not been properly formatted or accepted by the nominee. Please follow Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/nominate carefully. I have removed the RfA from WP:RFA. --Durin 18:25, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

fi:Kenkänokka and מנעלן

Greetings,

I would like to compare the featured article fi:Kenkänokka with the corresponding Hebrew article he:מנעלן. Unfortunately I know no Finnish. Could you please have a look on both articles dealing with this wonderful bird, so we'd know what's missing in either article?

Thanks in advance, Lior 05:36, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Lombard related articles

I read on your UserPage that you are a linguist and that you have studied the Lombard language.
Well, I wrote the most part of the article on Eastern Lombard and Eastern Lombard grammar, but, as I'm not a linguist, I'm pretty sure that a real linguist would find a lot of imprecisions. I am just an Eastern Lombard mothertongue (from Brescia) and I tried to describe my language as accurately I could on the basis of my rather scarce knowledge of linguistics.
Would you be interested in taking a look to these articles and improve it giving them a more scientific cut?

Thank you in advance,

-- Ninonino 08:13, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Congratulations! You are a highly skilled polyglot! However, I haver reason to believe you have forgotten to add to your user page the Babel template for the Milanese dialect (which I was looking forward to copying into my page). Ithunn (talk) 15:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re-opened Wikipedia Ainu proposal

Greetings, I noticed your interest in the Wikipedia Ainu proposal in the 2005-2006 timeframe, and am writing to let you know I have brought it back up for discussion at m:Requests for new languages/Wikipedia Ainu 2. I hope this is of interest to you! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:38, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jorgengb. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Isabelle de Charrière

Hello Jorgengb. Could you write/translate the article of Isabelle de Charrière (Q123386) for the Norwegian wikipedia? See https://snl.no/Isabelle_de_Charri%C3%A8re That would be appreciated. Boss-well63 (talk) 14:01, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Paolo De Benedetti (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Paolo De Benedetti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Paolo De Benedetti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jorgengb! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Paolo De Benedetti

Hello, Jorgengb. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Paolo De Benedetti, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:01, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Paolo De Benedetti

Hello, Jorgengb. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Paolo De Benedetti".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:49, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]