User talk:flamingspinach

Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end.
Start a new talk topic.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia, Flamingspinach! I hope you like the place and decide to keep contributing. Since I see you've already been active here, let me just give you a few links that are always useful as a handy reference guide:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question at the village pump or feel free to ask me on my Talk page.
Oh, and just in case you don't already know: to sign your name on a Talk page like I did below, the easiest way is just to type four tildes (~~~~). To customize your signature, look here.
And remember:Be Bold!

— Asbestos | Talk 19:21, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the first post! :P I'll make sure to read all of those. Just curious, but what article did you find my username on? — flamingspinach | (talk) 23:56, 2005 Mar 2 (UTC)

New messages!

See, not so lonley now. -- Dbroadwell 01:16, 7 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Heh, I knew that would provoke someone :) Hmm, I suppose I should provide some history for the hypothetical casual reader of my talk page (@_@) - in #wikipedia on Freenode, people were talking about the new messages dialogue, and I commented that I had only seen it once and was a lonely person. :P Er... can't find the new messages template... sorry... — flamingspinach | (talk) 01:20, 2005 Mar 7 (UTC)

C is for

For your rapid-fire anagrammatical intellect (or something like that...), here's a jumbo wikicookie. -- BRIAN0918 04:05, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Why thank you! :) I shall treasure it. — flamingspinach | (talk) 04:24, 2005 Mar 16 (UTC)

Re:Gmail invites

I totally wasnt aware, thanks! Will maybe sit and do a few off one time!

Selphie 11:08, 17 Mar 2005 (UTC) **

Thanks - you'd be helping out the internet. :) (For the record, this is in reference to a comment I made in Selphie's talk page about isnoop.net's gmail spooler.) — flamingspinach | (talk) 01:46, 2005 Apr 4 (UTC)

68.169.113.246

You sure can edit my pages.

Awesome, will do. (For the record, I had asked 68.169.113.246 (now Admiral Roo if I could edit eir user page for typographical errors.) — flamingspinach | (talk) 20:47, 2005 Jun 7 (UTC)

"test" tag on your page

You asked me about the 'test' tag I added. Sorry, that was my mistake... I misread the page history on a page and thought that you had created it. The history had only two entries, the page creation and a speedy delete. I read them backwards and thought you had created the page when you had added the speedy delete. I realized the mistake and took it off your talk page. Sorry about that! -Gblaz 13:16, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Ah, got it. Thanks for being vigilant! :P — flamingspinach | (talk) 21:10, 2005 Jun 17 (UTC)

seti

Hey, thanks! I wrote that months ago and completely forgot about the change. Are you a seti person, too? --Mothperson cocoon 12:18, 30 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I sure am! BTW, what do you mean "the change"? AFAIK it is impossible for any domain name to contain an @ symbol... — flamingspinach | (talk) 15:46:44, 2005-07-30 (UTC)

Thanks for that18:54, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

#REDIRECT

Thanks for that 19:01, 11 October 2005 (UTC)

Van der Veer

You tagged Van der Veer for speedy deletion. It doesn't seem to fit any of the speedy delete criteria. Since you used {{d}}, rahter than a more specific tempalte, i don't know what you thought the reason was. If you use {{db}} and give a reason, or use one of the many specific templates wihich inclue a pre-specified reason, it ius very helpful to admins looking theough the lsit of pages tagged for speedy deletion. DES ^(talk) 23:34, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I acted in haste. It seemed to me that Van der Veer should be a disambiguation page for various people with such a name, and since Google returns almost equal numbers of hits for "Van der Veer" and "Vandiver", I didn't think that labeling the former as an archaic version of the latter was completely appropriate. Perhaps an adaptation from information at this site would be in order? In any case, do what you think best. Sorry about that. — flamingspinach | (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page

Sorry, I assumed that HereToHelp was an admin fixing rogue admin action. --WAvegetarian 22:52, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Date standardization"

Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) before you go through a page and turn all the dates into links again, as you did with Scientology. Specifically, note:

If the date doesn't contain a day and a month, then date preferences won't work, and square brackets won't respond to your readers' auto-formatting preferences. So unless there is a special relevance of the date link, there's no need to link it. This is an important point: simple years, decades and centuries should only be linked if there's a strong reason for doing so. See Wikipedia:Make_only_links_relevant_to_the_context for the reasons that it's usually undesirable to insert low-value chronological links; see also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (links)#Internal links.

-Silence 18:46, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for pointing this out to me, and fixing my error. I'll keep this in mind for future edits. — flamingspinach | (talk) 17:51, 19 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Curly quotes

The curly qotes around “—All You Zombies—” read better with big type, and distinguish a page where the quotes round the title are intentional from pages created by new users who misunderstand how the Wikipedia search engine works. Susvolans ⇔ 17:53, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Clayton Carr Deletion

I came across the BS article at the same time. Not sure how to nominate for speedy deletion so I just quickly erased the page and hit save. Must have got your deletion by accident. Didn't mean to ruffle any feathers or mess with your work. Thanks for the heads up on speedy deletion. I am somewhat new to WP so I am still learning all of the ins and outs--Looper5920 06:32, 13 December 2005 (UTC) I had planned on getting rid of it. Just got lazy. --Looper5920 06:52, 13 December 2005 (UTC)Thanks for the reminder to do it.[reply]

Re Jayant

Thanks for the clarification.

Ummm... I'm rather embarrassed to see that there was a question for me way up there that I haven't answered in, what, ten months? Just in case you're still dying to find out the answer, I expect I didn't even notice what article you were editing: saw the red link, saw you hadn't been vandalizing, so welcomed you! Hmmm, sounds rather impersonal when put like that. Anyway, I guess I should be more attentive and notice when someone asks me a question...

Hi again, after ten months — hope others here have been more useful than me! — Asbestos | Talk (RFC) 05:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jayant412

Sometimes I get carried away with enthusiasm for one idea or another, where my skills might not be up to doing justice to the ideas.

As always there's lots more I would like to do than I find time to do, and sometimes my POV can take me into dangerous places. User:AlMac|^(talk) 07:52, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Western Diocese

Hello,

Regarding your recent questions, I have posted His Eminence's biography on behalf of the Western Diocese. If you have any questions regarding this article please feel free to eMail me at sderderian@armenianchurchwd.com

Peace,

Sevag Derderian

Fringe Shift

Can you change where it goes for me? (and tell me what you did) I've edited articles anon for a while and then a little as a reg'd user but that's my first new article and I'm a bit clueless when it comes to using the wiki editing tools. I was hoping I would offend enough english majors into editing it into something a little more presentable! ;) Nemesis75 23:21, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

<3

Leave me a message, will you? :P —Spectere 02:37, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

I appreciate your intelligent and tempered assistance with this fairly new wikipedia editor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pattersonc (talk • contribs) 2006-01-26 18:57:32

Thank you!

For the speedy vandal reversion on my userpage! Cheers Banez 19:19, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Oops. I didn't even know the other article exsisted. I'm perfectly fine with an merge. -Zero^Talk 19:58, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On Copyrights

I'm sorry, I added a bunch of articles at once and haven't had a chance to summarize it yet. That's why I left a link. When I get the chance I'll go through and fix them so I won't quote directly.
I understand, I deleted the info from the ones that hadn't been marked as copyright problems. Is there any other way to fix the problem? (sorry again, I'm new with all this stuff.--Torourkeus 21:52, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to my userpage

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my user page. Much appreciated. — Linnwood 22:55, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HELP

I,m been shocked you blamed me used help to ask for question. I think i not wrong by do that because my ex-helper offer the help warmly. If you not want to help just forget it. You should know Wikipedia is wide hard to found something we want.Aleenf1 06:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

St Mungo's Primary School, Glasgow

I don't believe that this warrants a CSD notice as Wikipedia:WikiProject_Schools indicates that school articles are to be kept and expanded. There is always a lot of talk generated when someone nominates a school article for deletion on AfD. This article needs a lot of cleaning up and expanding but it is not inherently worthless. The school does exist, according to Google.co.uk. (aeropagitica) 20:45, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! I have taken the good advice that you left for me on my Talk page and have attempted to do a NPOV re-write of St Mungo's Primary School. There is a little more information there now than previously and the categories and stubs have also been added. I would welcome any more comments that you have on this subject. Regards, (aeropagitica) 19:58, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You really are most kind with your description of me as an inclusionist, thank you! I hope that we cross paths on future collaborative edits and that the articles emerge improved as a result. Regards, (aeropagitica) 22:13, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Paper Wasp

Hi! Please see my reply at User talk:Arpingstone Thanks - Adrian Pingstone 21:32, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:TheEmoEater

Howdy. Was this accidental? android 79 19:49, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

I've awarded you this barnstar for reverting Android79's vandalism on my userpage.

Thank you, --TheEmoEater 19:50, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That edit was as a matter of policy, rather than as a desire to agree with you. Thanks, but no thanks. (I removed the barnstar) — flamingspinach | (talk) 19:55, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that we interpret WP:UP in rather different ways. I figured removal of racist content from a userpage would be a no-brainer, based on that page and on actions I've seen other administrators take. android 79 20:01, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2nded. --Syrthiss 20:10, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Flamingspinach, I don't understand why you would help theEmoEater maintain an attack page. That falls well outside the tolerance traditionally accorded to content in the userspace. Bishonen | ノート 20:12, 14 March 2006 (UTC).[reply]

It's cool. No harm, no foul. android 79 20:16, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As I noted on Bishonen's talk page:

"I hope you're not talking about me with "full-on troll mode" :< Sorry, it appears I had a vast misconception as to the extent of the sanctity of one's own userpage o.o Hope I haven't caused too much trouble! — flamingspinach | (talk) 03:45, 15 March 2006 (UTC)"[reply]

Sorry about this mess o.o — flamingspinach | (talk) 03:49, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, I just have to be more careful with my pronouns. :-/ android 79 03:56, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

o

I have usurped the sanctity of your comments page!!! Ahahahaha!! Or something along those lines, you know? -- Moogy 02:23, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

o — flamingspinach | (talk) 02:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

o Spaceboy~ 01:50, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

o

Stop triple spacing comments u n00b 8) — flamingspinach | (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Toby is frightened

Oh hi, just dropping a odd Wikipedia tradition on your page...

I happened to read your comment to the edibleOmplaLoompa about hidden Wikipedia traditions. I don't really have a tradition for you, but I have a hidden maintence job you might be interested in: Recently, the developers added a footnote feature to MediaWiki(the software the site runs on). Before that, footnotes were done with two templates {{ref}} and {{note}}. There are many thosands of pages that need to be translated from the old to the new system. If you're interested, head over to Template_talk:Ref and look around...

Oh, and, in case you haven't heard of it, you do not need to take any pages that need to be deleted to wP:AfD anymore. If you think the deletion will be uncontroversial, use the WP:PROD process instead. Enjoy your time at Wikipedia! JesseW, the juggling janitor 09:57, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Hi Flamingspinach, thank you for your interest in VandalProof and Congratulations! You are now one of our authorized users, so if you haven't already simply download VandalProof from our main page, install and you're ready to go!

If you have any problems please feel free to contact me or post a message on VandalProof's talk page. Once again congrats and welcome to our team! - Gl e n ^T_C (Stollery) 07:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available

After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thx

barnstars <3 Moogy^(talk) 10:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

sup

CONGRATULATIONS ON LIVING IN SINGAPORE LOL Moogy^(talk) 16:08, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

o thx lol — flamingspinach | (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

double post — flamingspinach | (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

wikEd

The wikEdlogo

Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.

wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus: • syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • more fixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages • convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjust the font size • and much, much more.

Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Usually it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.

Cacycle 21:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Professional fraternity; Beta Chi Theta; Full Metal Panic? Fumoffu; Acacia Fraternity; Hibernophile; Jacobi polynomials; The Divine Nine; Eskom; Sigma Delta Tau; Pavo (constellation); Tetrad (index notation); Octans; Sparse file; Grus (constellation); Fornax; Mixed tensor; Lambuth University; Omega Delta Phi; Phi Lambda Chi

Cleanup: DeWitt notation; Ed, Edd 'n' Eddy; Wirth-Weber precedence relationship
Merge: CSULA Greek System; Scottish Rite; Plate carrée projection
Add Sources: Pink; Untitled Evangelion Project; Manicure
Wikify: Interdenominational Theological Center; Jump rope; WSLS-TV
Expand: Buso Renkin; Rizelmine; Life-critical system

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 00:03, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CLOUDS - influential 60's Rock Group - vandalism

flamingspinach old friend don't delete other people's vfd comments.

oh my god.

i mean {{ohmygod}}

tgies 10:42, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't mean to - fucking edit conflicts :/ hope you fixed it for me like I asked since my connection sucks and it would have taken 5 hours to do so otherwise — flamingspinach | (talk) 10:51, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CLOUDS

I don't accept your definition of Clouds not being 'notable'. If you read the sources I left at the foot of the page, you'd find all the sources and verification you need. A cursory glance at Amazon. com, both in the Uk and the Usa, will show you who Clouds were. If you checked the Clouds website (www.cloudsmusic.com) as I originally suggested, you'd find yet more articles and references, including the 4 page MOJO Magazine article about Clouds/1-2-3 which credited them with 'The Birth of Prog', and in which, David Bowie describles Billy Ritchie as 'an unrecognised genius'. 'The History of Scottish Rock & Pop' is a BBC book (Guinness Publishing) - there seems ample source confirmation of everything said in the article. Unless the criteria is something completely different than I understand it to be, I don't see how the band can be dismissed as 'not notable'. Please re-check sources, and advise...thank you Matthew.hartington11:34 7 December 2006 —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Matthew.hartington (talk • contribs) 11:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The Crazy 8's

There's been some consolidation -- and, surprisingly, some controversy, over the information in the article about the college band The Crazy 8's. Swing by, give it a look, and if you can source some of that info that was in the older version of the page, well, that would be great. (I've tried sneding an e-mail to the corporation which bought The Gavin Report, to find out what happened to all their chart info, but so far, no luck.)

Thanks!

Jenolen ^{speak it!} 20:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History of Maharashtra

Hello sir, The site clearly mentions that all materials can be reproduced without permission and we have also included the link back to their website. Mhexp00000 05:35, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A person is blocking me because of his hatred for Maharashtra. I think ToS mentioned in website clearly states it can be used/reproduced.Hope no one will remove it. Donotblkme 05:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

... — flamingspinach | (talk) 06:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

child porn

noway! no sr! i am in no way shape or form in to child porn(now i did not say virtual child porn. m like lolicon)

saikano
down = anti not the slang term down
lolicon--Lolicon(Anti Child Porn)Saikano 18:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC) power to the pleco[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome Wikipedia user!I wish you best wishes of joy!I am a vegetarian also,there is something in common.I would like to be your friend,so,uh.., if you want drop me a line sometime!Bye!Trampton 11:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I want to be your friend, too, fs-kun. (^^)b Moogy^(talk) 13:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

o Voretus 18:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not do this again

Please do not put back links all ova muh(my) page cuz(cause) i dont appreciate it ... =] Pretty Ricky aint breakin up yall! yay!! Tam` Tam` =] 21:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New Category

Just dropping a line on some people to let them know about a new category of Wikipedians I've created--Category:Wikipedians who like Dune. Cheers! Urania3 04:53, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marking EFS for deletion

You marked EFS (extreme four square) for deletion as non-context and the talk page has a new post contesting this. The mark should definitely be reconsidered. Please at least take a look at the talk page comments. Thank you, GKasparov

Abdallah Higazy

[1]Are you going to delete Abdallah Higazy? If so, why? — goethean ॐ 16:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hang On Re: Hofstra Academic Units

Please see Hofstra Academic Units talk page for hang on details. Thank you. Mbisanz 03:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your NPWatcher application

Dear Flamingspinach,

Thank you for applying for NPWatcher! You've been approved to use it. Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if there is a newer release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist). Report any bugs or feature suggestion here. If you need help, feel free to contact me or join NPWatcher.

Snowolf ^{How can I help?} 21:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of St Mungo's Primary School

An article that you have been involved in editing, St Mungo's Primary School, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St Mungo's Primary School. Thank you. --B. Wolterding 13:20, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Glomp

With regard to your comments on Talk:Glomp: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.-- RoninBK _{T C} 06:15, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Friendly

WP:Friendly is p. good for warning guys and stuff. It works a lot like WP:Twinkle. tgies (talk) 14:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

momfuck.txt

vn-9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999

This user talk page has been vandalized 9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 times.

Moogy^(talk) 17:39, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[ok i removed this it was too fucking long] — flamingspinach | (talk) 02:42, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

o kthx — flamingspinach | (talk) 17:45, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dead-Ass Bitches

Bitches in the park
Gonna find it gonna park around it
Waiting for the day when the homies can bank upon it
Bitches say "shit" — they didn't know that I had so much on it
Everybody gonna work up on it
Scrubs up in the blink don't know shit, they can't communicate
Please consult What Wikipedia is not before creating your first article
Gonna make 'em remember, gonna make 'em rue the day
Bitches say "shit" — they didn't know that I had so much on it

tgies (talk) 07:42, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-class ratification vote

I would like to draw your attention to Wikipedia talk:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment#Ratification vote on C-Class, where an additional class on the article assessment scale is being discussed. tgies (talk) 02:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your reminding! 百家姓之四討論 (Discussion) 03:53, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pisg

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pisg. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pisg. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:25, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kenzan

How is Kenzan not notable???(LonerXL (talk) 13:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ufologist

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ufologist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article consists of a dictionary definition or other article that has been transwikied to another project and the author information recorded.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GManNickG (talk) 18:43, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You canceled your speedy deletion request and decided to redirect the page to Ufology. When I started the article it was a redirect to Ufology. This notice properly belongs on User talk:Vicsinge. — flamingspinach | (talk) 20:32, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Debian". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! 84.127.80.114 (talk) 16:39, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Will you be participating or should we start without you? --Guy Macon (talk) 13:43, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to start without me. — flamingspinach | (talk) 20:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration case request: Debian

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Debian and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks,

This request may still be in the filing party's talk page. 84.127.80.114 (talk) 19:40, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Case request declined

The arbitration request involving you (Debian) has been declined by the Arbitration Committee

The comments made by arbitrators may be helpful in proceeding further. For the Arbitration Committee,--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Flamingspinach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Flamingspinach. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Flamingspinach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]