Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baou Trust
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep as redirect. Despite the large number of votes to delete, I am exercising my discretion as the closer of this discussion. The redirect is consistent with the VfD decision on QuakeAID above. Since the two companies are closely linked, I consider this a much better outcome. It directs readers to a fact-based page about a suspicious entity. I strongly believe that, had the other voters returned to this discussion thread after the changes to the QuakeAID article and after seeing that this article was redirected to it, they would have amended their votes. Rossami (talk) 04:26, 21 Jan 2005 (UTC)
Self promotion. Also see: George Dracos, Kaith and QuakeAID. —RaD Man (talk) 22:06, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, advertising. Ливай | ☺ 22:22, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, advertising. Rje 00:37, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- It's strange that the creator feels the need to link to the trademarks. Suspicious, too. Delete. hfool/Wazzup? 03:04, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, vanity ad. Wyss 03:20, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Delete. This page was created by an employee of this "company" (see User:Baoutrust). Somebody in the WWW 06:14, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: spam. Wile E. Heresiarch 07:22, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Spam, self-promo, non-notable, ... --kooo 18:26, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Dori | Talk 04:16, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete for the reasons above Hoary 06:06, 2005 Jan 4 (UTC)
- Delete Spam. --Wikimol 08:25, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Was this speedied? GRider\talk 18:10, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, quote: "14:23, Jan 4, 2005 Neutrality deleted Baou Trust (Per VfD - especially egregious vanity (self-promotion))" --kooo 19:06, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Curiously, why does this get treatment different from the other four self-promotional contributions by User:Baoutrust? GRider\talk 23:30, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- I wondered too, who put the "speedy" tag onto Baou_Trust page? Is there any way to trace this? --Godric 08:25, Jan 5, 2005 (UTC)
- Curiously, why does this get treatment different from the other four self-promotional contributions by User:Baoutrust? GRider\talk 23:30, 4 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, quote: "14:23, Jan 4, 2005 Neutrality deleted Baou Trust (Per VfD - especially egregious vanity (self-promotion))" --kooo 19:06, Jan 4, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Spam. Jayjg | (Talk) 18:08, 7 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- NOTE: The page Baou_Trust now redirects to QuakeAID due to the new facts unearthed about QuakeAID and its parent and sibling companies. Please reconsider the votes casted. --Godric 22:50, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
- Redirect to QuakeAID (was keep) - All the sister pages (QuakeAID, OfficialWire, excluding Kaith) now weave together into a clearer picture of reality. --Godric 22:50, Jan 7, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.