Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Game
Appearance
A rather silly entry, speedied before but the (newbie) user recreated it. So on behalf of their opposition to its deletion, I list it here. Dunc_Harris|☺ 13:21, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC) — further note to the newbie, we're not trying to bite you :)
- Useless dicdef, delete. It's in widespread use, but I suppose everyone who ever hears it will know what it means. (and if there's any need at all for the definition, it should be an additional entry in GG because that's what people not familiar with the phrase would be searching for) -- Ferkelparade π 13:32, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Why would anybody even look up "good game"? And what kind of article could possibly link to it? Livajo 14:23, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete: Dictdef. Livajo, the answer to the first one is unknown. The answer to the second makes me shudder. ("Today, in the news, Canada had five more top 8 finishers by per capita GDP, in what was unquestionably a good game in women's freestyle curling.") Geogre 14:51, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Dictdef, pointless. — Gwalla | Talk 17:15, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- I added a short entry to GG, (its pretty common practice to have very short dicdefs on disambig pages, to avoid confusion), delete now. [[User:Siroxo|—siroχo
—siroχo]] 20:16, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Are we running a dictionary or an encyclopedia? If we have a list of abbreviations, then move it there. PedanticallySpeaking 20:27, Aug 26, 2004 (UTC)
- Wiktionary redirect. That way the newbie is happy... at least his stupid entry is somewhere. -- Allyunion 22:41, 26 Aug 2004 (UTC)