Talk:Thomas Dadford

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thomas Dadford article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK Waterways Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject UK Waterways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of UK Waterways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UK WaterwaysWikipedia:WikiProject UK WaterwaysTemplate:WikiProject UK WaterwaysUK Waterways articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Source

Source: Edward Paget-Tomlison's "Illustrated History of Canals & River Navigations" Andy Mabbett 22:46, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

What's the copyright date of that? Rick K 22:48, Jul 20, 2004 (UTC)

No idea. Andy Mabbett 23:11, 20 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Then doesn't that make this a copyright violation? Rick K 19:14, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)

No. Andy Mabbett 19:57, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Please explain why not. Rick K 22:08, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)

Because I haven't breached anyone's copyright. If you think otherwise, please exlplain how you think I have. Andy Mabbett 22:11, 21 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Um, because you cited a source above? Rick K 23:12, Jul 21, 2004 (UTC)

There's a big difference between research and plagiarism! Andy Mabbett 10:42, 22 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Then why is the source above necessary? Rick K 19:06, Jul 22, 2004 (UTC)