Jump to content

Talk:Wonder Woman

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeWonder Woman was a Language and literature good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 11, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed
November 22, 2012Peer reviewNot reviewed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Orphaned references in Wonder Woman

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Wonder Woman's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ic5":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 07:07, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Crossed out revisions

[edit]

3 revisions made on 29 december are crossed out and unavailable to view. The prev of the revision right above the 3 crossed out revisions is also unviewable. What were these revisions and why were they so bad that they had to be crossed out? Trimetwes fan1003 (talk) 07:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal of Diana Prince

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was the decision to merge

The purpose of the Diana Prince article has been questioned in the past at Talk:Diana Prince, although not much progress was made in regards to those efforts. I am here to propose that most of that article's relevant contents be merged into Wonder Woman and Wonder Woman in other media where applicable, because it is, broadly constructed, still focused mainly on the same character, just under a different name and another minor character who also used the name in the same comics before it was repurposed by the title Wonder Woman character. There is precedence for merging these secret identity articles in the past, namely with Talk:Superman/Archive 7#Proposed merge of Clark Kent into Superman back in 2020 and the Bruce Wayne redirect having been prevented from returning to an article.

As it currently stands, the Diana Prince article does not meet WP:GNG and WP:NFICTION. There is not much independent or significant coverage of this Diana Prince identity of the character that is separate from the main Wonder Woman character, and any coverage of Diana Prince I have seen is connected to Wonder Woman regardless. That article only cites 3 independent sources for this Diana Prince identity (a The Hollywood Reporter article, the book "Truly, Modly, Deeply: The Diana Prince Era", and a CinemaBlend article discussing aspects being incorporated into the film character in Batman v Superman).

It also includes "The Essential Wonder Woman Encyclopedia" as a ref, while the remaining 22 references are all DC Comics publications with no direct sources to back up the material being presented, and are purely being used to discuss the in-universe details of the Wonder Woman character using this Diana Prince identity, most of which are unsourced. This all falls under pure WP:FANCRUFT, and much of the contents can easily be incorporated into the Wonder Woman article and the article for her other media versions where necessary. There are several images here that could also merit some inclusion elsewhere, though I believe not all would remain. Trailblazer101 (talk) 06:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Trailblazer101 I agree with you, and since there are no objections, I'll proceed with closing the merge per WP:MERGECLOSE. However, regarding "I am here to propose that most of that article's relevant contents be merged into Wonder Woman and Wonder Woman in other media where applicable," could you clarify what specific content you think should be included in the "Wonder Woman in Other Media" section? Lililolol (talk) 23:50, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Roger that. I was thinking the contents from the "In other media" and "Diana as successful businesswoman" sections could be merged into the in other media article to not overload the main article. Trailblazer101 (talk) 16:00, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.