Talk:Universal dialectic

Philosophy: Metaphysics / Continental / Eastern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Metaphysics
	Continental philosophy
	Eastern philosophy

Why was this article "cut down by 50%?" The article is now a stub. Weird.

Because it was somewhat padded, and listed on Vfd. It may now survive.

Charles Matthews 09:41, 19 Dec 2003 (UTC)

I added a couple of external links. Yes, they go to my sites, but these are the only sites I know of that deal with this concept. I also added links to materialism and monism, since I felt that linking only to idealism was inappropriate. The Universal Dialectic concept is not idealistic at all, it is actually much closer to materialism. But rather than remove the link to idealism, I thought it more fair to add the other links. Nat 08:02, 28 Mar 2004 (UTC)

The "Universal Dialectic" entry appears to be a weak attempt at self promotion to your websites. Which, by the way, do not appear to have much traffic.

Check the IP on this user (User:Factchecker007). I am betting it is User:66.66.117.237, who has been vandalizing all pages related to me recently. The anonymous user at that IP is an individual who has a personal problem with me, and has been vandalizing other websites I own as well. --Nat 22:03, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This article fails to explain what the uiversal dialectic even is!

You know what? You're right. A previous version did explain the concept, but that portion was removed. I'll see if I can add a brief explanation. --Nat 22:09, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]