Talk:Aerophone

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Musical Instruments, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of musical instruments on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Musical InstrumentsWikipedia:WikiProject Musical InstrumentsTemplate:WikiProject Musical Instrumentsmusical instruments articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that one or more audio files of a musical instrument or component be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons and included in this article to improve its quality by demonstrating the way it sounds or alters sound. Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Mexico#Ancient cultures|ancient Mexico]] The anchor (#Ancient cultures) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Untitled

There are two divisions: free aerophones, wind instruments, and free reed instruments. Huh? -phma

No, the free reeds are a kind of free aerophone. I'll try to make it a bit clearer.

Are you sure the free reed instrument is an aerophone? Since the reed, not the air, produces the tone, it seems to me to be a blown idiophone. -phma

Well, Erich von Hornbostel and Curt Sachs specifically cite the harmonica (and so by extension all free reeds) as an example of a free aerophone in the original 1914 version of their scheme. The point is that in free aerophones the flow of air is broken by the instrument, and it is that "broken" air which we hear; whereas in blown idiophones the air flow causes the instrument to vibrate, and the sound we hear is as a result of this secondary vibration, rather than stemming from the same flow of air that causes the instrument to vibrate in the first place. It's a tricky point, and I will try to clarify it further later, but it's basically the difference between blowing on the edge of a sheet of paper, making a squeaking sound (your breath is interrupted by the edge which makes the sound - the paper vibrates, but only a little); and blowing on the flat surface of a piece of paper (or flapping it around in the air), thus causing the paper itself to rustle. I hope that makes at least a little sense. --Camembert

Aeoline

I came here from the Accordion page by clicking a link to Aeoline. Presumably the Aeoline page gave a little more information about the aeoline than the little given on the Accordion page. (I was hoping for a picture.) However some ~~wan~~ helpful person has replaced it with a redirect to this page, which says nothing at all about the aeoline, save the Redirection notice itself. Was there a point to this? Koro Neil (talk) 15:01, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

I've added a couple of references to the page, which might mean that the tag can come off; but will leave this to more experienced editors at this stage. Please also feel free to check & confirm that the references meet WP:RS or any other applicable policies; and if I got the formatting right. - Ryk72 (talk) 18:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Aerophone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100728135148/http://www.brindavangurukul.org/bansuri.htm to http://www.brindavangurukul.org/bansuri.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:31, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]