Penman equation

The Penman equation describes evaporation (E) from an open water surface, and was developed by Howard Penman in 1948. Penman's equation requires daily mean temperature, wind speed, air pressure, and solar radiation to predict E. Simpler Hydrometeorological equations continue to be used where obtaining such data is impractical, to give comparable results within specific contexts, e.g. humid vs arid climates.

Details

Numerous variations of the Penman equation are used to estimate evaporation from water, and land. Specifically the Penman–Monteith equation refines weather based potential evapotranspiration (PET) estimates of vegetated land areas. It is widely regarded as one of the most accurate models, in terms of estimates.

The original equation was developed by Howard Penman at the Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, UK.

The equation for evaporation given by Penman is:

$E_{\mathrm {mass} }={\frac {mR_{n}+\rho _{a}c_{p}\left(\delta e\right)g_{a}}{\lambda _{v}\left(m+\gamma \right)}}$

where:

m = Slope of the saturation vapor pressure curve (Pa K⁻¹)

R_n = Net irradiance (W m⁻²)

ρ_a = density of air (kg m⁻³)

c_p = heat capacity of air (J kg⁻¹ K⁻¹)

δe = vapor pressure deficit (Pa)

g_a = momentum surface aerodynamic conductance (m s⁻¹)

λ_v = latent heat of vaporization (J kg⁻¹)

γ = psychrometric constant (Pa K⁻¹)

which (if the SI units in parentheses are used) will give the evaporation E_mass in units of kg/(m²·s), kilograms of water evaporated every second for each square meter of area.

Remove λ to obviate that this is fundamentally an energy balance. Replace λ_v with L to get familiar precipitation units ET_vol, where L_v=λ_vρ_water. This has units of m/s, or more commonly mm/day, because it is flux m³/s per m²=m/s.

This equation assumes a daily time step so that net heat exchange with the ground is insignificant, and a unit area surrounded by similar open water or vegetation so that net heat & vapor exchange with the surrounding area cancels out. Some times people replace R_n with and A for total net available energy when a situation warrants account of additional heat fluxes.

Temperature, wind speed, relative humidity impact the values of m, g, c_p, ρ, and δe.

Shuttleworth (1993)

In 1993, W.Jim Shuttleworth modified and adapted the Penman equation to use SI, which made calculating evaporation simpler. The resultant equation is:

$E_{\mathrm {mass} }={\frac {mR_{n}+\gamma *6.43\left(1+0.536*U_{2}\right)\delta e}{\lambda _{v}\left(m+\gamma \right)}}$

where:

E_mass = Evaporation rate (mm day⁻¹)

m = Slope of the saturation vapor pressure curve (kPa K⁻¹)

R_n = Net irradiance (MJ m⁻² day⁻¹)

γ = psychrometric constant = ${\frac {0.0016286*P_{kPa}}{\lambda _{v}}}$ (kPa K⁻¹)

U₂ = wind speed (m s⁻¹)

δe = vapor pressure deficit (kPa)

λ_v = latent heat of vaporization (MJ kg⁻¹)

Some useful relationships

δe = (e_s - e_a) = (1 – relative humidity) e_s

e_s = saturated vapor pressure of air, as is found inside plant stoma.

e_a = vapor pressure of free flowing air.

e_s, mmHg = exp(21.07-5336/T_a), approximation by Merva, 1975

Therefore $m=\Delta ={\frac {de_{s}}{dT_{a}}}={\frac {5336}{T_{a}^{2}}}e^{\left(21.07-{\frac {5336}{T_{a}}}\right)}$, mmHg/K

T_a = air temperature in kelvins

See also

• Pan evaporation
• Evapotranspiration
• Thornthwaite model
• Blaney–Criddle equation
• Penman–Monteith equation

References

• Jarvis, P.G. (1976) The interpretation of the variations in leaf water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 273, 593–610.
• Neitsch, S.L.; J.G. Arnold; J.R. Kliniry; J.R. Wolliams. 2005. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Document; Version 2005. Grassland, Soil and Water Research Laboratory; Agricultural Research Service. and Blackland Research Center; Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. Temple, Texas. https://web.archive.org/web/20090116193356/http://www.brc.tamus.edu/swat/downloads/doc/swat2005/SWAT%202005%20theory%20final.pdf
• Penman, H.L. (1948): Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc. Roy. Soc. London A(194), S. 120–145.