Talk:London '66–'67

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the London '66–'67 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pink Floyd Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pink Floyd, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pink Floyd on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pink FloydWikipedia:WikiProject Pink FloydTemplate:WikiProject Pink FloydPink Floyd articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was a past project collaboration.

To-do list:

Fair use

Add fair use rationale to all images and sound samples (all except images already labeled free use).
Re-size large images around to 300 pixels (all "fair use" images), other than album covers (already done).

Articles

Expand all articles to at least Start class. Some song stubs can't be expanded and should be redirected to the relevant album article. Use the "Interstellar Overdrive" article as an example when editing a song stub.
Expand all of the Floyd's studio album articles to at least GA status.
See COTM for monthly collabs.

Project building

Add WikiProject Pink Floyd banner {{WPFloyd}} to all appropriate Talk pages.
Personally invite quality editors working on Pink Floyd articles to join the project.

If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list.

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Progressive Rock Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Progressive Rock, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Progressive rock on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Progressive RockWikipedia:WikiProject Progressive RockTemplate:WikiProject Progressive RockProgressive rock articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Is this really an album by or an EP? RedWolf 06:10, Apr 1, 2004 (UTC)

Good question - I think it's an EP. I'll change the page to reflect that. --Auximines 09:13, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)

why is it called 66 67 if none of it was recorded in 66?

Track listing

The cd re-issue does not contain those single tracks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.26.205.1 (talk) 10:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

What tracks does it contain then?77.99.98.37 (talk) 17:48, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

I have raised concerns about the recent page move for this article on the Pink Floyd WikiProject talk page. --A Knight Who Says Ni (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I propose that Nick's Boogie be merged into London '66–'67. I think that the content in the Nick's Boogie article can easily be explained in the context of London '66–'67, and the London '66–'67 article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Nick's Boogie will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Better this than it simply being deleted. Careful With That Axe, Eugene ^Hello... 09:50, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support - as proposer, obviously. Careful With That Axe, Eugene ^Hello... 09:55, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I think some of the content of the article belongs here. Better than just deleting it. Cdl obelix (talk) 18:52, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]