Talk:Fingerprint
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fingerprint article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Reference of Fingerprint in the Holy Quran
[edit]Fingerprints are unique to each individual. We all have fingerprints however they are unique. Even identical twins have different fingerprints. However nobody knew this 1400 years ago. But it was mentioned in the Quran that on Resurrection Day Allah will recreate humans with all details even their fingertips. Today we know that those contain fingerprints which are unique to each individual.
Quran: 75.4 Yes indeed; We are Able to reconstruct his fingertips.
On Resurrection Day Allah will reconstruct our bodies to the smallest detail even our unique fingerprints. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yusuf.islam.al (talk • contribs) 04:00, 28 March 2019 (UTC)
- Didier NIYITANGA 197.157.184.12 (talk) 18:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Classification systems
[edit]The part of this section beginning with "The system used by most experts" is very confusing. There are two mathematical formula, which do not match each other ( does not equal ) and there's an additional 1 added in the calculation that isn't part of either stated formula. It seems, from Henry Classification System, that the quantity is usually not reduced: you can have the fraction 32/32 and that's not written as 1/1, nor as 1. This part also isn't cited, which makes it hard to determine what was intended. -Apocheir (talk) 23:28, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- I've rewritten this portion to make it more straightforward -- including an explicit formula -- with attention to the point about not reducing the fraction. (I also removed the maintenance tag.) — r.e.s. (talk) 18:56, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 7 May 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Typo in text. "Fringerprint" as opposed to "Fingerprint". Additional r after F. Camicarva (talk) 19:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done Many thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
😃HANIA 139.135.38.179 (talk) 14:51, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Trouble sourcing a claim
[edit]Hello! I recently noticed that all claims citing the existence of 'The Volume of Crime Scene Investigation—Burglary (Qin Dynasty)' wherein the authors make the claim of palm and finger printing being used in the Qin Dynasty come from a single 7 page article:
Xiang-Xin, Z.; Chun-Ge, L. The Historical Application of Hand Prints in Chinese Litigation. J. Forensic Ident. 1988, 38 (6), 277–284.
I was curious as a Chinese Historian as I had never heard of this primary source before - and given the limited primary sources about the Qin dynasty I wanted to investigate. Every source I have been able to find making this claim always cite this single source (or like the citation in this article, cite someone who cites this source) and never the primary source directly. I can not find a copy of the journal article to verify the claim (though https://archive.org/details/sim_journal-of-forensic-identification_1988-1997_38-47_cumulative-index/page/668/mode/2up shows it does indeed appear in that journal). I'm not prepared to spend money to try and verify the claim and wanted to know if someone more familiar with this journal could take a look and make sure this is a reliable claim and not just a case of circular citation off-discipline. Relm (talk) 20:04, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 31 October 2024
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Text in bold links to the article itself, change link to fingerprint scanner or remove.
"Since 2000, electronic fingerprint readers have been introduced as consumer electronics security applications. Fingerprint sensors could be used for login authentication and the identification of computer users."
(Under "Consumer electronics login authentication" of "Fingerprint sensors") Cosmiroq (talk) 00:41, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class Law enforcement articles
- Low-importance Law enforcement articles
- WikiProject Law Enforcement articles
- B-Class Anatomy articles
- Low-importance Anatomy articles
- Anatomy articles about gross anatomy
- WikiProject Anatomy articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors