Talk:Empire (Queensrÿche album)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Metal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of heavy metal music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MetalWikipedia:WikiProject MetalTemplate:WikiProject MetalHeavy Metal articles

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Cover Artwork

I love this album, but could somebody explain why they chose to use that horribly blown up, pixelated artwork for the cover? The symbol was obviously originally on a white background and just placed over black with little to no editing. I'd swear they wanted it to look that bad. Cale 22:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure they DID, in fact want it to look pixelated and aliased against a white background. 201.14.230.151 (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

mini concept album

i am curious to know the story behind the miniature concept album on this reccord could someone go into greater detail? killemall22 68.167.150.24 15:35, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Empire (Queensrÿche album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.rollingstone.com/artists/recordings.asp?oid=1134&cf=1134
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?resultpage=3&table=SEARCH_RESULTS&action=&title=&artist=Queensryche&format=&debutLP=&category=&sex=&releaseDate=&requestNo=&type=&level=&label=&company=&certificationDate=&awardDescription=&catalogNo=&aSex=&rec_id=&charField=&gold=&platinum=&multiPlat=&level2=&certDate=&album=&id=&after=&before=&startMonth=1&endMonth=1&startYear=1958&endYear=2008&sort=Artist&perPage=25
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/search-results-album/_/Empire#album
Added archive {newarchive} to http://norwegiancharts.com/showitem.asp?interpret=Queensr%FFche&titel=Empire&cat=a
Added archive {newarchive} to http://hitparade.ch/showitem.asp?interpret=Queensr%FFche&titel=Empire&cat=a
Added archive {newarchive} to http://dutchcharts.nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Queensr%FFche&titel=Empire&cat=a
Added archive {newarchive} to http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Queensr%FFche&titel=Empire&cat=a
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/search-results-album/_/Empire#single
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/search-results-album/_/Silent+Lucidity#single
Added archive {newarchive} to http://hitparade.ch/showitem.asp?interpret=Queensr%FFche&titel=Silent+Lucidity&cat=s
Added archive {newarchive} to http://dutchcharts.nl/showitem.asp?interpret=Queensr%FFche&titel=Silent+Lucidity&cat=s
Added archive {newarchive} to http://charts.org.nz/showitem.asp?interpret=Queensr%FFche&titel=Silent+Lucidity&cat=s
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/search-results-album/_/Best+I+Can#single
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/search-results-album/_/Jet+City+Woman#single
Added archive {newarchive} to http://www.musiccanada.com/GPSearchResult.aspx?st=empire&ica=False&sa=queensryche&sl=&smt=0&sat=-1&ssb=Artist
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140625075145/http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certified-awards.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Theme / concept

This article lacks information about the narrative theme of the album. Is it a concept album like Operation: Mindcrime before it, or a loosely-themed collection of songs? Is there a narrative running through the tracks? — OwenBlacker (talk; please {{ping}} me in replies) 08:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Genre warring

I noticed in the astounding number of edits that the new editor Category adder amass every day a single-handed crusade to promote his point of view about musical genres, with disregard of other editors' opinions and work and general ignorance of Wikipedia policies and etiquette. The scope of Wikipedia is to promote culture and knowledge writing new articles and expanding existing ones, not just editing infoboxes and cluttering them with nonsense and dubious sources (Template:Infobox album#genre, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes#References in infoboxes). An editor does not delete entire discographies, like he did for Mr.Big for example, just because the articles have not been worked upon for some time. Again, notability on existing articles is usually based on consensus and communication, not on the whim of the last wiki-hero. The references that he inserts copiously in every infobox come from sources that should be selected, read through and understood before using them. Genre warring is unfortunately quite common on the musical sections of this encyclopedia and, in my years working on Wikipedia, I have found plenty of "proud warriors" ready to revert edits a hundred times to prove their point. There is no point! There is no crusade! There is a shared work to improve articles, based on consensus, not arrogance. There are policies to apply to have consensus and talk pages in every article and in project pages for discussing things out. I suggest to Category adder to study the former and use the latter, before applying drastic changes to the work of others. Lewismaster (talk) 17:14, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]