Talk:Mount Waesche

Mount Waesche has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 20, 2020. (Reviewed version).

Volcanoes Mid‑importance

	Volcanoes portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Volcanoes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of volcanoes, volcanology, igneous petrology, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VolcanoesWikipedia:WikiProject VolcanoesTemplate:WikiProject VolcanoesWikiProject Volcanoes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mountains Mid‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Antarctica Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Antarctica, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Antarctica on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AntarcticaWikipedia:WikiProject AntarcticaTemplate:WikiProject AntarcticaAntarctica articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

[1]
Google

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mount Waesche/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 12:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks interesting. I will post my comments soon. Cheers, Sainsf (talk · contribs) 12:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No dablinks or copyvio issues detected. General comments:

mountain of volcanic origin Maybe link 'volcanic' if you have linked 'mountain' (in the main text too)
Unlinked both, that was totally unnecessary. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
volcanic origin, standing 20 kilometres not sure if a comma is needed
I am not sure on this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SW of Mount Sidley you say 'southwest' in places, this should be consistent
Changed to "southwest". Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
the south and southwestern slopes 'southern' you mean?
Yes, changed this. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
V. Admiral Does it mean 'Vice'? Would be good to expand it
Expanded. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The region also includes the highest volcano in Antarctica Seems worthy of a mention in the lead
Copied it up there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
10 kilometres (6.2 mi)-12 kilometres (7.5 mi) Reads better as 10–12 kilometres (6.2–7.5 mi).. note the endash
Changed, at the price of a less precise source-text congruence. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Blue ice is found in some areas Repeats a fact mentioned a few lines before
Blue ice (glacial) and Blue-ice area are not exactly the same thing. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
ongoing magmatic activity 'magma' can be linked
Linked. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Plio-Pleistocene tephra layers 'tephra' should be linked (first mention after lead)
Linked. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
between 2.0-1.1 million years ago Endash
Duplinks: moraine, Mount Sidley, Marie Byrd Land, Executive Committee Range, Mount Hampton, seismic activity (remove these links after their first mention)
Done. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Refs: Citations look good, but a few journal articles need subscription to be accessed. You can add {{subscription required}} to those.
I am not sure I can do this here. I have access to some of them and I am not sure how to recognize these that need tagging. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All in all a really interesting and comprehensive article :) Cheers and stay safe. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 11:12, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sainsf:Got these. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:17, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Looks all good to me. Ready for promotion :) Sainsf (talk · contribs) 13:25, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]